AAC
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carlisle, H. N.
Right arrow Articles by Saslaw, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carlisle, H. N.
Right arrow Articles by Saslaw, S.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1972 June; 1(6): 460-465
Copyright © 1972 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Comparison of Clindamycin, Erythromycin, and Methicillin in Streptococcal Infections in Monkeys

Harold N. Carlisle and Samuel Saslaw

1 Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio 43210

ABSTRACT

Intravenous inoculation of a group A hemolytic streptococcus caused lethal infections in all of eight untreated monkeys. Intramuscular injections of clindamycin-2-phosphate in a daily dose of 25 mg/kg given in equal morning and afternoon doses for 10 days resulted in survival of all of eight monkeys. Similar results were observed with the same dose schedule of clindamycin hydrochloride given intragastrically; no fatalities occurred among eight monkeys. In monkeys receiving erythromycin stearate intragastrically or methicillin intramuscularly, three of eight and four of eight monkeys, respectively, died. Duration of both illness and positive blood cultures was greater in the erythromycin- and methicillin-treated survivors than in the clindamycin-treated monkeys. The differences in results between clindamycin and erythromycin could not be correlated with serum antibacterial activity levels, which were similar, or with minimal inhibitory concentrations, which were 0.02 µg/ml with both antibiotics. With methicillin, however, the minimal inhibitory concentration was 0.16 µg/ml and serum antibacterial activity varied from titers of less than 1:2 to 1:8. As in previous studies of staphylococcal infections in monkeys with the same antibiotics, in vitro susceptibility data and serum antibacterial activity did not completely correlate with in vivo results.


Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1972 June; 1(6): 460-465
Copyright © 1972 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
J. Clin. Microbiol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1972 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.