AAC
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gravelle, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kushner, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gravelle, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kushner, D. J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1972 June; 1(6): 470-475
Copyright © 1972 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

The Elusive Permeability Barriers and Binding Sites for Proflavine in Escherichia coli

M. Joan Gravelle, B. M. Mehta and D. J. Kushner

Department of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, KIN 6N5, Ontario, Canada

ABSTRACT

Cells of proflavine-sensitive and -resistant Escherichia coli strains were altered in different ways, and the proflavine binding of the changed material was studied. Spheroplasts prepared from sensitive and resistant cells bound similar amounts of proflavine at saturation, whether or not they were osmotically protected by 10% sucrose. Intact cells bound approximately the same amounts of proflavine as spheroplasts. On addition of glucose, osmotically protected resistant but not sensitive spheroplasts released proflavine; unprotected spheroplasts did not release bound proflavine. Thus, osmotically protected membranes are not required for proflavine binding (a passive process) but are required for proflavine release (an active process). The presence of sucrose reduced proflavine binding by resistant cells. Adding glucose to cells in 20% sucrose did not cause a release of residual proflavine, though glucose caused a release of proflavine from cells suspended in 0 or 10% sucrose. On treatment of heated cells or ruptured spheroplasts with nucleases and Pronase, practically all nucleic acids were removed. Proflavine-binding ability of such preparations fell by only 30 to 50%. Washing heated cells with ethanol did not reduce their proflavine-binding ability. There appear to be important binding sites in cells aside from nucleic acids.


Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1972 June; 1(6): 470-475
Copyright © 1972 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
J. Clin. Microbiol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1972 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.