AAC
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gray, B. M.
Right arrow Articles by Dillon, H. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gray, B. M.
Right arrow Articles by Dillon, H. C., Jr.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978 June; 13(6): 988-991
Copyright © 1978 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus to Cefaclor and Cephalothin: Laboratory and Clinical Studies

Barry M. Gray, Carol A. Hubbell and Hugh C. Dillon Jr.

Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama in Birmingham, School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama 35294

ABSTRACT

In vitro susceptibility tests of 201 strains of Staphylococcus aureus by agar dilution revealed 90% to be susceptible to 8 µg or less of cefaclor per ml. Strains from hospitalized children and adults were more often resistant than those from patients with bullous impetigo. Cephalothin was more active than cefaclor against all strains tested. Results with disk tests, including those strains examined from the clinical investigation, revealed some discrepancies in identifying strains more resistant to cefaclor. In clinical studies, cefaclor proved quite effective for the treatment of bullous impetigo. Of 73 patients, 90% were cured and 7% improved after completing 5 or more days of treatment. Prompt improvement was noted among most patients seen 3 to 5 days after treatment was begun. One patient experienced mild diarrhea. There were no other adverse or toxic manifestations attributable to therapy.


Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978 June; 13(6): 988-991
Copyright © 1978 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
J. Clin. Microbiol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1978 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.