AAC
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, J D
Right arrow Articles by Aird, M Y
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, J D
Right arrow Articles by Aird, M Y

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 April; 17(4): 554-557

Comparison of amoxicillin and ampicillin activities in a continuous culture model of the human urinary bladder.

J D Anderson, K R Johnson and M Y Aird

ABSTRACT

Sixteen isolates of Escherichia coli were obtained from women with significant acute urinary tract infections who were subsequently treated with amoxicillin. The activities of amoxicillin and ampicillin against these organisms were compared in urine in a continuous culture apparatus which partly simulated the milieu of the human urinary bladder. After introduction of amoxicillin into the bladder model, mean viable counts for 14 susceptible strains (minimum inhibitory concentration less than or equal to 32 microgram/ml) at 10, 20, 30, and 45 min fell to 34, 8, 0.4, and 0.2% of the original. Corresponding figures for ampicillin were 56, 24, 11, and 2.4%. Viable counts obtained at seven timed intervals up to 2 h were significantly (P = 0.025) lower with amoxicillin than ampicillin. Both antibiotics had a similar activity in conventional disk susceptibility and surface plate minimum inhibitory concentration tests. The realism of the model was confirmed by comparing response to amoxicillin in vivo and in vitro. A serious discrepancy was seen in only one of the 16 cases.


Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 April; 17(4): 554-557







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
J. Clin. Microbiol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1980 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.