AAC
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elnima, E I
Right arrow Articles by Al-Badr, A A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Elnima, E I
Right arrow Articles by Al-Badr, A A

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981 January; 19(1): 29-32

Antibacterial and antifungal activities of benzimidazole and benzoxazole derivatives.

E I Elnima, M U Zubair and A A Al-Badr

ABSTRACT

The in vitro antibacterial and antifungal activities of six benzimidazole and benzoxazole derivatives were tested against standard strains and 59 clinical isolates. Of the six compounds, only compounds II and III (both benzoxazoles) were active, whereas the rest were devoid of any activity. Considerable growth inhibition of all of the standard strains, including fungi and gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, resulted when they were treated with these compounds. Fifty-nine clinical isolates of Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus were tested for susceptibility to the two compounds. The most susceptible were the S. aureus isolates. The two compounds were of comparable activity against all of the isolates, with compound III showing a slightly higher activity than compound II. Their respective minimal inhibitory concentrations for 90% inhibition of S. aureus were 25 and 50 microgram/ml. The gram-negative bacteria were resistant to the two compounds and required minimal inhibitory concentrations of 200 microgram/ml for a similar degree of inhibition.


Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981 January; 19(1): 29-32




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
J. Clin. Microbiol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1981 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.