AAC
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Penn, R G
Right arrow Articles by Giger, D K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Penn, R G
Right arrow Articles by Giger, D K

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983 October; 24(4): 494-499

Comparison of moxalactam and gentamicin in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections.

R G Penn, L C Preheim, C C Sanders and D K Giger

ABSTRACT

Moxalactam and gentamicin were compared in a prospective, randomized study of 49 hospitalized patients with complicated urinary tract infections. Patients received parenteral moxalactam, 250 mg every 12 h, or gentamicin, 1 mg/kg every 8 h. The average duration of therapy (moxalactam, 7.5 days; gentamicin, 8.6 days) was similar for both groups. Sixty-two percent of patients treated with moxalactam and 57% of those receiving gentamicin were cured of their infection, as defined by a negative culture after therapy. No side effects required discontinuation of either drug. An enterococcus caused two superinfections and three reinfections in patients treated with moxalactam. Moxalactam resistance developed in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from three patients treated with moxalactam. Moreover, two of these isolates showed decreased susceptibility to gentamicin, tobramycin, and amikacin. An additional 10 patients with gentamicin-resistant but moxalactam-susceptible isolates were treated with moxalactam. Forty percent of these patients were cured of their infections. Moxalactam appears to be a safe, effective drug for complicated urinary tract infections caused by susceptible bacteria, including those resistant to gentamicin. However, patients receiving moxalactam should be carefully monitored to detect enterococcal superinfections or development of resistance to moxalactam in isolates of P. aeruginosa.


Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983 October; 24(4): 494-499




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
J. Clin. Microbiol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1983 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.