This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blaser, J
Right arrow Articles by Zinner, S H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Blaser, J
Right arrow Articles by Zinner, S H

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985 July; 28(1): 64-68

Impact of netilmicin regimens on the activities of ceftazidime-netilmicin combinations against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model.

J Blaser, B B Stone, M C Groner and S H Zinner

ABSTRACT

The antibacterial activities of ceftazidime and netilmicin were studied in a two-compartment in vitro model. Pseudomonas aeruginosa cultures were exposed to changing drug concentrations that mimic human pharmacokinetics. Netilmicin alone reduced the numbers of organisms in cultures of the susceptible strains by more than 99% within 4 h; however, regrowth occurred after 8 h. Although ceftazidime alone killed more slowly than netilmicin, only one of the five strains regrew within 28 h. When both drugs were combined, rapid initial killing occurred without subsequent regrowth. Studied after 24 h in combination with ceftazidime, netilmicin was as effective when given as a single daily dose as when administered in three daily doses that provided 50% more aminoglycoside per day. Decreased bacterial susceptibility was seen after ceftazidime exposure for one strain and after netilmicin exposure for all originally netilmicin-susceptible strains. No such reduction in susceptibility was observed during exposure to the combination. The results of standard in vitro checkerboard tests for synergism were predictive of the initial (4 to 8 h) but not the final (24 to 28 h) assessment of drug interaction in the pharmacokinetic model.


Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985 July; 28(1): 64-68




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Turnidge, J., Paterson, D. L. (2007). Setting and Revising Antibacterial Susceptibility Breakpoints. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 20: 391-408 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Mueller, M., de la Pena, A., Derendorf, H. (2004). Issues in Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Anti-Infective Agents: Kill Curves versus MIC. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48: 369-377 [Full Text]