This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murray, B E
Right arrow Articles by Mederski-Samoraj, B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Murray, B E
Right arrow Articles by Mederski-Samoraj, B

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986 December; 30(6): 861-864

Comparison of two beta-lactamase-producing strains of Streptococcus faecalis.

B E Murray, D A Church, A Wanger, K Zscheck, M E Levison, M J Ingerman, E Abrutyn and B Mederski-Samoraj

ABSTRACT

A second strain of enterococcus (PA) producing beta-lactamase (Bla+ phenotype) was compared with the previously reported Bla+ enterococcus, strain HH22. As with the original strain, there was a marked inoculum effect when PA was tested with penicillin, ampicillin, and piperacillin; no difference was noted with methicillin, cephalothin, imipenem, or vancomycin; the difference with ticarcillin was intermediate. High-level gentamicin resistance (Gmr) transferred from PA to an enterococcal recipient strain at a frequency approximately 100-fold lower than for HH22; all Gmr transconjugants from both strains were Bla+, but only PA showed linkage of Gmr and Bla+ with transfer of resistance to streptomycin, tetracycline, and chloramphenicol. EcoRI digestion of plasmid DNA from Gmr Bla+ transconjugants showed no similarities between the two strains. A 5.1-kilobase EcoRI Bla+-encoding fragment derived from HH22 was cloned into an Escherichia coli cloning vector and shown to hybridize to a 10.2-kilobase EcoRI fragment derived from PA; both fragments hybridized to an 840-base-pair staphylococcal Bla+ gene probe. These data indicate that the penicillinases are similar but encoded on different or differently arranged plasmids. The fact that both are transferable emphasizes the potential for this new streptococcal resistance determinant to disseminate.


Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986 December; 30(6): 861-864




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Nallapareddy, S. R., Wenxiang, H., Weinstock, G. M., Murray, B. E. (2005). Molecular Characterization of a Widespread, Pathogenic, and Antibiotic Resistance-Receptive Enterococcus faecalis Lineage and Dissemination of Its Putative Pathogenicity Island. J. Bacteriol. 187: 5709-5718 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ono, S., Muratani, T., Matsumoto, T. (2005). Mechanisms of Resistance to Imipenem and Ampicillin in Enterococcus faecalis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49: 2954-2958 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ida, T., Okamoto, R., Nonoyama, M., Irinoda, K., Kurazono, M., Inoue, M. (2002). Antagonism between Aminoglycosides and {beta}-Lactams in a Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolate Involves Induction of an Aminoglycoside-Modifying Enzyme. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46: 1516-1521 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Chirurgi, V. A., Oster, S. E., Goldberg, A. A., McCabe, R. E. (1992). Nosocomial Acquisition of {beta}-Lactamase--Negative, Ampicillin-Resistant Enterococcus. Arch Intern Med 152: 1457-1461 [Abstract]  
  • Wells, V. D., Wong, E. S., Murray, B. E., Coudron, P. E., Williams, D. S., Markowitz, S. M. (1992). Infections Due to Beta-Lactamase-producing, High-Level Gentamicin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis. ANN INTERN MED 116: 285-292 [Abstract]  
  • Rupar, D. G., Fisher, M. C., Fletcher, H., Mortensen, J. (1989). Emergence of Isolates Resistant to Ampicillin. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 143: 1033-1037 [Abstract]  
  • HOFFMANN, S. A., MOELLERING, R. C. Jr. (1987). The Enterococcus: "Putting the Bug in Our Ears". ANN INTERN MED 106: 757-761 [Abstract]