This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heifets, L B
Right arrow Articles by Lindholm-Levy, P J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heifets, L B
Right arrow Articles by Lindholm-Levy, P J

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986 December; 30(6): 927-932

Ethambutol MICs and MBCs for Mycobacterium avium complex and Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

L B Heifets, M D Iseman and P J Lindholm-Levy

ABSTRACT

We determined the MICs of ethambutol for both Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains by using broth dilution (7H12 broth, radiometric method) and agar dilution (7H11 agar) methods. We found the MICs to be much lower in liquid than in solid medium. The broth-determined MICs for susceptible M. tuberculosis and most of the M. avium strains were comparable to the levels in blood of patients, being lower than the peak levels. We propose that the MICs, determined radiometrically in in 7H12 broth, be considered as tentative criteria for susceptibility testing of M. avium isolates in future clinical trials. The use of these values instead of critical concentrations should also be considered as an alternative to the conventional susceptibility testing method in chemotherapy of tuberculosis. Ethambutol produced bactericidal effects against both M. tuberculosis and M. avium, and the MIC/MBC ratios were in the same range for both species when MICs and MBCs were tested in 7H12 broth by conventional sampling and plating.


Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986 December; 30(6): 927-932




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Krishnan, M. Y., Manning, E. J. B., Collins, M. T. (2009). Comparison of three methods for susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis to 11 antimicrobial drugs. J Antimicrob Chemother 64: 310-316 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Jadaun, G. P. S., Agarwal, C., Sharma, H., Ahmed, Z., Upadhyay, P., Faujdar, J., Gupta, A. K., Das, R., Gupta, P., Chauhan, D. S., Sharma, V. D., Katoch, V. M. (2007). Determination of ethambutol MICs for Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium avium isolates by resazurin microtitre assay. J Antimicrob Chemother 60: 152-155 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Syre, H., Valvatne, H., Sandven, P., Grewal, H. M. S. (2006). Evaluation of the nitrate-based colorimetric method for testing the susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to streptomycin and ethambutol in liquid cultures. J Antimicrob Chemother 57: 987-991 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Hazbon, M. H., Bobadilla del Valle, M., Guerrero, M. I., Varma-Basil, M., Filliol, I., Cavatore, M., Colangeli, R., Safi, H., Billman-Jacobe, H., Lavender, C., Fyfe, J., Garcia-Garcia, L., Davidow, A., Brimacombe, M., Leon, C. I., Porras, T., Bose, M., Chaves, F., Eisenach, K. D., Sifuentes-Osornio, J., Ponce de Leon, A., Cave, M. D., Alland, D. (2005). Role of embB Codon 306 Mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Revisited: a Novel Association with Broad Drug Resistance and IS6110 Clustering Rather than Ethambutol Resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49: 3794-3802 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Parsons, L. M., Salfinger, M., Clobridge, A., Dormandy, J., Mirabello, L., Polletta, V. L., Sanic, A., Sinyavskiy, O., Larsen, S. C., Driscoll, J., Zickas, G., Taber, H. W. (2005). Phenotypic and Molecular Characterization of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolates Resistant to both Isoniazid and Ethambutol. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49: 2218-2225 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Hazbon, M. H., Guarin, N., Ferro, B. E., Rodriguez, A. L., Labrada, L. A., Tovar, R., Riska, P. F., Jacobs, W. R. Jr. (2003). Photographic and Luminometric Detection of Luciferase Reporter Phages for Drug Susceptibility Testing of Clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 4865-4869 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Madison, B., Robinson-Dunn, B., George, I., Gross, W., Lipman, H., Metchock, B., Sloutsky, A., Washabaugh, G., Mazurek, G., Ridderhof, J. (2002). Multicenter Evaluation of Ethambutol Susceptibility Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by Agar Proportion and Radiometric Methods. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 3976-3979 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Mokrousov, I., Otten, T., Vyshnevskiy, B., Narvskaya, O. (2002). Detection of embB306 Mutations in Ethambutol-Susceptible Clinical Isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from Northwestern Russia: Implications for Genotypic Resistance Testing. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 3810-3813 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Conte, J. E. Jr., Golden, J. A., Kipps, J., Lin, E. T., Zurlinden, E. (2001). Effects of AIDS and Gender on Steady-State Plasma and Intrapulmonary Ethambutol Concentrations. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45: 2891-2896 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Linde, C. M. A., Hoffner, S. E., Refai, E., Andersson, M. (2001). In vitro activity of PR-39, a proline-arginine-rich peptide, against susceptible and multi-drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Antimicrob Chemother 47: 575-580 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ramaswamy, S. V., Amin, A. G., Göksel, S., Stager, C. E., Dou, S.-J., El Sahly, H., Moghazeh, S. L., Kreiswirth, B. N., Musser, J. M. (2000). Molecular Genetic Analysis of Nucleotide Polymorphisms Associated with Ethambutol Resistance in Human Isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44: 326-336 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Zhanel, G. G., Saunders, M. H., Wolfe, J. N., Hoban, D. J., Karlowsky, J. A., Kabani, A. M. (1998). Comparison of CO2 Generation (BACTEC) and Viable-Count Methods To Determine the Postantibiotic Effect of Antimycobacterial Agents against Mycobacterium avium Complex. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42: 184-187 [Abstract] [Full Text]