This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ASM journals
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Menzies, R E
Right arrow Articles by MacCulloch, D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Menzies, R E
Right arrow Articles by MacCulloch, D

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987 January; 31(1): 42-45

Cephalosporin susceptibility of methicillin-resistant, coagulase-negative staphylococci.

R E Menzies, B M Cornere and D MacCulloch

ABSTRACT

Coagulase-negative staphylococci were tested for susceptibility to methicillin, cephradine, ceftriaxone, cephalothin, and cefamandole by standard broth microdilution. Most of the 26 methicillin-resistant isolates were susceptible to cephalothin and cefamandole, but very few were susceptible to ceftriaxone, and none was susceptible to cephradine. The proportion of bacterial cells that grew in the presence of 128 micrograms of methicillin per ml was calculated for each methicillin-resistant isolate. Those with every cell or 1 in 10 cells resistant to 128 micrograms of methicillin per ml included the isolates that were most resistant to the cephalosporins and highly resistant to methicillin. Those with 1 cell resistant in 10(5) or 10(6) cells were the isolates most susceptible to the cephalosporins, and their methicillin MICs were lower. When cells resistant to 128 micrograms of methicillin per ml were used as inocula for broth microdilution tests, resistance to cephradine remained the same, but resistance to ceftriaxone, cephalothin, and cefamandole increased significantly. Cefamandole was the only cephalosporin which retained antibacterial activity against some methicillin-resistant isolates (12 of 26). Cephradine, ceftriaxone, cephalothin, and cefamandole resistance appeared to be expressed by the same cells that expressed methicillin resistance. In this way, cross resistance was demonstrated between methicillin and the cephalosporins.

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987 January; 31(1): 42-45






Copyright © 2010 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»