AAC
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dutka-Malen, S
Right arrow Articles by Courvalin, P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dutka-Malen, S
Right arrow Articles by Courvalin, P

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990 October; 34(10): 1875-1879

Phenotypic and genotypic heterogeneity of glycopeptide resistance determinants in gram-positive bacteria.

S Dutka-Malen, R Leclercq, V Coutant, J Duval and P Courvalin

Unité des Agents Antibactériens, Unité Associé National de la Recherche Scientifique 271, Institut Pasteur, Paris France.

ABSTRACT

Gram-positive glycopeptide-resistant bacteria isolated in various hospitals in Europe and in the United States between 1986 and 1988 were collected. Three resistance phenotypes could be distinguished. Thirty-one enterococci were highly resistant to vancomycin and teicoplanin. Resistance was transferable to other enterococci by conjugation for 16 of the 22 isolates that were tested. Homology was detected by hybridization between a probe specific for the vanA gene, which encodes an inducible high-level glycopeptide resistance protein in Enterococcus faecium BM4147, and DNA of the 31 clinical isolates and the 16 corresponding transconjugants. This indicates that a single class of resistance determinants accounts for high-level glycopeptide resistance in enterococci. The strains differed in their biotypes and resistance phenotypes and harbored resistance plasmids of various sizes, suggesting that spread of this resistance phenotype is due to dissemination of a gene rather than of a bacterial clone or of a single plasmid. Four enterococcal isolates were resistant to low levels of vancomycin and susceptible to teicoplanin. Twenty-three coagulase-negative staphylococcal isolates were resistant to teicoplanin and susceptible to vancomycin. These two groups of strains did not hybridize with the vanA probe and did not transfer resistance at a detectable frequency. The vanA gene was not detected in the glycopeptide-producing strains of Amycolatopsis orientalis (vancomycin) and Actinoplanes teichomyceticus (teicoplanin) or in various gram-positive bacteria intrinsically resistant to glycopeptides.

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990 October; 34(10): 1875-1879




This article has been cited by other articles:



Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
J. Clin. Microbiol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1990 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.