AAC
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Halstenson, C E
Right arrow Articles by Awni, W M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Halstenson, C E
Right arrow Articles by Awni, W M

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991 November; 35(11): 2382-2387

Isepamicin disposition in subjects with various degrees of renal function.

C E Halstenson, J S Kelloway, M B Affrime, C C Lin, M A Teal, B E Shapiro and W M Awni

Drug Evaluation Unit, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415.

ABSTRACT

The disposition of isepamicin, an investigational aminoglycoside antibiotic, was evaluated in 30 subjects with various degrees of renal function. The subjects were divided into five groups: those with normal renal function (creatinine clearance [CLCR], greater than 80 ml/min/1.73 m2), those with mild renal insufficiency (CLCR, 50 to 80 ml/min/1.73 m2), those with moderate renal insufficiency (CLCR, 30 to 49 ml/min/1.73 m2), those with severe renal insufficiency (CLCR, 5 to 29 ml/min/1.73 m2), and those maintained on hemodialysis (CLCR, less than 5 ml/min/1.73 m2). Subjects on hemodialysis were studied both during hemodialysis and during an interdialytic period. The volumes of distribution of isepamicin were not significantly different among the five groups of patients. The total body clearance (CLP) and renal clearance (CLR) of isepamicin significantly decreased as CLCR decreased. The CLP of isepamicin and CLCR were significantly related [(COP = 0.391.[CLCR] + 1.83; r2 = 0.878)]. Nonrenal clearance of isepamicin did not differ between groups. Hemodialysis augmented the CLP of isepamicin by approximately 25-fold. The amount of isepamicin recovered in the dialysate was 60.6 +/- 15.8% of the dose administered. The maximal rebound of the isepamicin concentration in plasma after cessation of hemodialysis was observed at 0.78 +/- 0.7 h. Concentrations in plasma increased 32.7 +/- 22.9% over that measured at the end of hemodialysis. These data indicate that dosage adjustments are necessary in subjects with decreased renal function.


Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991 November; 35(11): 2382-2387




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
J. Clin. Microbiol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1991 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.