AAC
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guay, G G
Right arrow Articles by Rothstein, D M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guay, G G
Right arrow Articles by Rothstein, D M

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993 February; 37(2): 191-198

Expression of the tetK gene from Staphylococcus aureus in Escherichia coli: comparison of substrate specificities of TetA(B), TetA(C), and TetK efflux proteins.

G G Guay and D M Rothstein

Department of Microbial Genetics, Lederle Laboratories, Pearl River, New York 10965.

ABSTRACT

The tetK gene, which encodes a tetracycline efflux pump from Staphylococcus aureus, was expressed in Escherichia coli by using an inducible, low-level expression system. The tetK gene, as well as the tetA(B) gene from the transposon Tn10 and the tetA(C) gene from plasmid pBR322, was subjected to the regulatory control of the lac repressor, and resistance to tetracycline was measured as a function of the isopropyl-beta-D-thiogalactopyranoside concentration. The maximum resistance of the E. coli strain containing the tetK construct was comparable to the maximum resistance of the strain containing the tetA(C) construct but was less than the resistance of the strain containing the tetA(B) construct. Overexpression of the tetK, tetA(B), or tetA(C) genes was toxic. When expression was regulated so that resistance to tetracycline was comparable, then the TetA(B) and TetA(C) proteins conferred very similar levels of resistance to a variety of tetracycline derivatives. In contrast, the TetK protein was less capable of conferring resistance to the tetracycline derivatives minocycline, 6-deoxy-6-demethyltetracycline, and doxycycline. The implications for the recognition of various tetracycline substituents by the TetK protein are discussed.


Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993 February; 37(2): 191-198




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
J. Clin. Microbiol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1993 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.