AAC
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Turner, R B
Right arrow Articles by Hayden, F G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Turner, R B
Right arrow Articles by Hayden, F G

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993 February; 37(2): 297-300

Efficacy of oral WIN 54954 for prophylaxis of experimental rhinovirus infection.

R B Turner, F J Dutko, N H Goldstein, G Lockwood and F G Hayden

Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston 29425.

ABSTRACT

The efficacy of oral WIN 54954 for the prevention of rhinovirus infection and illness was tested in two randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled volunteer challenge studies. Volunteers were inoculated with rhinovirus type 39 (MIC of WIN 54954, 0.17 microgram/ml) or rhinovirus type 23 (MIC, 0.016 microgram/ml). The volunteers received two doses of drug (600 mg per dose) or placebo on the first day; this was followed by three doses on each of the subsequent 5 days. All volunteers were challenged with virus after the third dose of study drug. No significant antiviral or clinical effect was detected in either study. Pharmacokinetic studies revealed that on the last day of drug administration, 38 of 39 (97%) volunteers had trough levels of WIN 54954 in plasma greater than the MIC for the respective virus. Nasal wash specimens collected on the same day revealed a detectable level in only 6 of 24 (25%) volunteers at the peak (range, 6 to 24 ng/ml) and in only 2 of 14 (14%) volunteers at the trough (range, 6 and 7 ng/ml). These results suggest that the lack of efficacy of WIN 54954 against rhinovirus may be related to an inability to deliver sufficient drug to the site of viral infection.


Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993 February; 37(2): 297-300




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
J. Clin. Microbiol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1993 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.