AAC
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Paul, M.
Right arrow Articles by Deniau, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Paul, M.
Right arrow Articles by Deniau, M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Aug 1997, 1731-1734, Vol 41, No. 8
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Activity of a new liposomal formulation of amphotericin B against two strains of Leishmania infantum in a murine model

M Paul, R Durand, H Fessi, D Rivollet, R Houin, A Astier and M Deniau
Laboratoire de Pharmacotechnie, Service Pharmacie, CHU H. Mondor, Creteil, France. alastier@micronet.fr

The efficacy of a new liposomal formulation of amphotericin B was compared to that of amphotericin B deoxycholate (Fungizone) in a murine model of visceral leishmaniasis induced by Leishmania infantum. Median effective doses (ED50) were determined with two different strains: strain 1 was obtained from an untreated patient, and strain 2 was obtained from a patient who had received 12.5 g of amphotericin B over 3 years. BALB/c mice were infected intravenously on day 0 with promastigotes and then treated on days 14, 16, and 18 (strain 1) or on days 21, 23, and 25 (strain 2) with the liposomal formulation of amphotericin B (five doses were tested for each strain: 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 0.8, and 3 mg/kg of body weight) or with conventional amphotericin B (four doses were tested for each strain: 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, and 0.8 mg/kg). Mice in the control group received normal saline solution. The liposomal amphotericin B formulation was about three times more active than the conventional drug against both strains. ED50 of the liposomal formulation were 0.054 (strain 1) and 0.194 (strain 2) mg/kg. ED50 of conventional amphotericin B were 0.171 (strain 1) and 0.406 (strain 2) mg/kg. Determination of drug tissular levels, 3 days after the last drug administration, showed a drug accumulation in hepatic and splenic tissues much higher after administration of liposomal amphotericin B than after conventional amphotericin B. A lack of toxicity was noted in all groups treated with the liposomal formulation.


This article has been cited by other articles:



Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
J. Clin. Microbiol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.