This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Firsov, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Zinner, S. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Firsov, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Zinner, S. H.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, March 1998, p. 659-665, Vol. 42, No. 3
0066-4804/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Inter- and Intraquinolone Predictors of Antimicrobial Effect in an In Vitro Dynamic Model: New Insight into a Widely Used Concept

Alexander A. Firsov,1,* Alexander A. Shevchenko,1 Sergey N. Vostrov,1 and Stephen H. Zinner2

Department of Pharmacokinetics, Centre of Science & Technology LekBioTech, Moscow 117246, Russia,1 and Division of Infectious Diseases, Roger Williams Medical Center, Rhode Island Hospital, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island2

Received 15 May 1997/Returned for modification 5 October 1997/Accepted 20 December 1997

Earlier efforts to search for pharmacokinetic and bacteriological predictors of fluoroquinolone antimicrobial effects (AMEs) have resulted in conflicting findings. To elucidate whether these conflicts are real or apparent, several predictors of the AMEs of two pharmacokinetically different antibiotics, trovafloxacin (TRO) and ciprofloxacin (CIP), as well as different dosing regimens of CIP were examined. The AMEs of TRO given once daily (q.d.) and CIP given q.d. and twice daily (b.i.d.) against Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Klebsiella pneumoniae were studied in an in vitro dynamic model. Different monoexponential pharmacokinetic profiles were simulated with a TRO half-life of 9.2 h and a CIP half-life of 4.0 h to provide similar eightfold ranges of the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)-to-MIC ratios, from 54 to 432 and from 59 to 473 (µg · h/ml)/(µg/ml), respectively. In each case the observation periods were designed to incorporate full-term regrowth phases in the time-kill curves, and the AME was expressed by its intensity (IE; the area between the control growth and time-kill and regrowth curves up to the point at which the viable counts of regrowing bacteria are close to the maximum values observed without drug). Species-independent linear relationships were established between IE and log AUC/MIC, log AUC above MIC (log AUCeff), and time above the MIC (Teff). Specific and nonsuperimposed IE versus log AUC/MIC or log AUCeff relationships were inherent in each of the treatments: TRO given q.d. (r2 = 0.97 and 0.96), CIP given q.d. (r2 = 0.98 and 0.96), and CIP given b.i.d. (r2 = 0.95 and 0.93). This suggests that in order to combine data sets obtained with individual quinolones to examine potential predictors, one must be sure that these sets may be combined. Unlike AUC/MIC and AUCeff, the IE-Teff relationships plotted for the different quinolones and dosing regimens were nonspecific and virtually superimposed (r2 = 0.95). Hence, AUC/MIC, AUCeff, and Teff were equally good predictors of the AME of each of the quinolones and each dosing regimen taken separately, whereas Teff was also a good predictor of the AMEs of the quinolones and their regimens taken together. However, neither the quinolones nor the dosing regimens could be distinguished solely on the basis of Teff, whereas they could be distinguished on the basis of AUC/MIC or AUCeff. Thus, two types of predictors of the quinolone AME may be identified: intraquinolone and/or intraregimen predictors (AUC/MIC, AUCeff and Teff) and an interquinolone and interregimen predictor (Teff). Teff may be able to accurately predict the AME of one quinolone on the basis of the data obtained for another quinolone.

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Pharmacokinetics, Centre of Science & Technology LekBioTech, 8 Nauchny proezd, Moscow 117246, Russia. Phone: 7 (095) 332-3435. Fax: 7 (095) 331-0101. E-mail: biotec{at}glas.apc.org.

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, March 1998, p. 659-665, Vol. 42, No. 3
0066-4804/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.


This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Lubenko, I. Yu., Strukova, E. V., Smirnova, M. V., Vostrov, S. N., Portnoy, Y. A., Zinner, S. H., Firsov, A. A. (2008). Telavancin and vancomycin pharmacodynamics with Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro dynamic model. J Antimicrob Chemother 62: 1065-1069 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Firsov, A. A., Lubenko, I. Y., Smirnova, M. V., Strukova, E. N., Zinner, S. H. (2008). Enrichment of Fluoroquinolone-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Oscillating Ciprofloxacin Concentrations Simulated at the Upper and Lower Portions of the Mutant Selection Window. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52: 1924-1928 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Firsov, A. A., Smirnova, M. V., Lubenko, I. Yu., Vostrov, S. N., Portnoy, Y. A., Zinner, S. H. (2006). Testing the mutant selection window hypothesis with Staphylococcus aureus exposed to daptomycin and vancomycin in an in vitro dynamic model. J Antimicrob Chemother 58: 1185-1192 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ba, B. B., Arpin, C., Vidaillac, C., Chausse, A., Saux, M.-C., Quentin, C. (2006). Activity of Gatifloxacin in an In Vitro Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Model against Staphylococcus aureus Strains either Susceptible to Ciprofloxacin or Exhibiting Various Levels and Mechanisms of Ciprofloxacin Resistance.. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50: 1931-1936 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Firsov, A. A., Lubenko, I. Y., Vostrov, S. N., Portnoy, Y. A., Zinner, S. H. (2005). Antistaphylococcal Effect Related to the Area under the Curve/MIC Ratio in an In Vitro Dynamic Model: Predicted Breakpoints versus Clinically Achievable Values for Seven Fluoroquinolones. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49: 2642-2647 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Firsov, A. A., Vostrov, S. N., Lubenko, I. Yu., Arzamastsev, A. P., Portnoy, Y. A., Zinner, S. H. (2004). ABT492 and levofloxacin: comparison of their pharmacodynamics and their abilities to prevent the selection of resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro dynamic model. J Antimicrob Chemother 54: 178-186 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ba, B. B., Feghali, H., Arpin, C., Saux, M.-C., Quentin, C. (2004). Activities of Ciprofloxacin and Moxifloxacin against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Emergence of Resistant Mutants in an In Vitro Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48: 946-953 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Mueller, M., de la Pena, A., Derendorf, H. (2004). Issues in Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Anti-Infective Agents: Kill Curves versus MIC. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48: 369-377 [Full Text]  
  • Schentag, J. J, Meagher, A. K, Forrest, A. (2003). Fluoroquinolone AUIC Break Points and the Link to Bacterial Killing Rates: Part 1: In Vitro and Animal Models. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 37: 1287-1298 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Zhanel, G. G, Noreddin, A. M (2003). Fluoroquinolone AUIC Break Points and the Link to Bacterial Killing Rates: In Vitro Models. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 37: 1331-1334 [Full Text]  
  • Firsov, A. A., Vostrov, S. N., Lubenko, I. Y., Drlica, K., Portnoy, Y. A., Zinner, S. H. (2003). In Vitro Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of the Mutant Selection Window Hypothesis Using Four Fluoroquinolones against Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 1604-1613 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Firsov, A. A., Zinner, S. H., Vostrov, S. N., Portnoy, Y. A., Lubenko, I. Yu. (2002). AUC/MIC relationships to different endpoints of the antimicrobial effect: multiple-dose in vitro simulations with moxifloxacin and levofloxacin. J Antimicrob Chemother 50: 533-539 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • MacGowan, A. P., Rogers, C. A., Holt, H. A., Wootton, M., Bowker, K. E. (2001). Pharmacodynamics of Gemifloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae in an In Vitro Pharmacokinetic Model of Infection. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45: 2916-2921 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Firsov, A. A., Lubenko, I. Y., Portnoy, Y. A., Zinner, S. H., Vostrov, S. N. (2001). Relationships of the Area under the Curve/MIC Ratio to Different Integral Endpoints of the Antimicrobial Effect: Gemifloxacin Pharmacodynamics in an In Vitro Dynamic Model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45: 927-931 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Wright, D. H., Brown, G. H., Peterson, M. L., Rotschafer, J. C. (2000). Application of fluoroquinolone pharmacodynamics. J Antimicrob Chemother 46: 669-683 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Firsov, A. A., Lubenko, I. Yu., Vostrov, S. N., Kononenko, O. V., Zinner, S. H., Portnoy, Y. A. (2000). Comparative pharmacodynamics of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin in an in vitro dynamic model: prediction of the equivalent AUC/MIC breakpoints and equiefficient doses. J Antimicrob Chemother 46: 725-732 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Delacher, S., Derendorf, H., Hollenstein, U., Brunner, M., Joukhadar, C., Hofmann, S., Georgopoulos, A., Eichler, H. G., Muller, M. (2000). A combined in vivo pharmacokinetic-in vitro pharmacodynamic approach to simulate target site pharmacodynamics of antibiotics in humans. J Antimicrob Chemother 46: 733-739 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • MacGowan, A., Rogers, C., Bowker, K. (2000). The use of in vitro pharmacodynamic models of infection to optimize fluoroquinolone dosing regimens. J Antimicrob Chemother 46: 163-170 [Full Text]  
  • MacGowan, A., Rogers, C., Holt, H. A., Wootton, M., Bowker, K. (2000). Assessment of different antibacterial effect measures used in in vitro models of infection and subsequent use in pharmacodynamic correlations for moxifloxacin. J Antimicrob Chemother 46: 73-78 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Vostrov, S. N., Kononenko, O. V., Lubenko, I. Y., Zinner, S. H., Firsov, A. A. (2000). Comparative Pharmacodynamics of Gatifloxacin and Ciprofloxacin in an In Vitro Dynamic Model: Prediction of Equiefficient Doses and the Breakpoints of the Area under the Curve/MIC Ratio. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44: 879-884 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Bowker, K. E., Wootton, M., Rogers, C. A., Lewis, R., Holt, H. A., MacGowan, A. P. (1999). Comparison of in-vitro pharmacodynamics of once and twice daily ciprofloxacin. J Antimicrob Chemother 44: 661-667 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Firsov, A. A., Vasilov, R. G., Vostrov, S. N., Kononenko, O. V., Lubenko, I. Yu., Zinner, S. H. (1999). Prediction of the antimicrobial effects of trovafloxacin and ciprofloxacin on staphylococci using an in-vitro dynamic model. J Antimicrob Chemother 43: 483-490 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Firsov, A. A., Vostrov, S. N., Kononenko, O. V., Zinner, S. H., Portnoy, Y. A. (1999). Prediction of the Effects of Inoculum Size on the Antimicrobial Action of Trovafloxacin and Ciprofloxacin against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli in an In Vitro Dynamic Model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43: 498-502 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Firsov, A. A., Vostrov, S. N., Shevchenko, A. A., Portnoy, Y. A., Zinner, S. H. (1998). A New Approach to In Vitro Comparisons of Antibiotics in Dynamic Models: Equivalent Area under the Curve/MIC Breakpoints and Equiefficient Doses of Trovafloxacin and Ciprofloxacin against Bacteria of Similar Susceptibilities. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42: 2841-2847 [Abstract] [Full Text]  


Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»