This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tack, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Group, T. C. P. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tack, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Group, T. C. P. S.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, May 1998, p. 1073-1075, Vol. 42, No. 5
0066-4804/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Five-Day Cefdinir Treatment for Streptococcal Pharyngitis

Kenneth J. Tack,1,* Daniel C. Henry,2 W. Manford Gooch,3 Douglas N. Brink,1 Constance H. Keyserling,1 and The Cefdinir Pharyngitis Study Groupdagger

Parke-Davis Pharmaceutical Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan,1 and Foothill Family Clinic,2 and University of Utah School of Medicine and Medical Research Associates of Utah, Inc.,3 Salt Lake City, Utah

Received 17 December 1997/Returned for modification 26 January 1998/Accepted 28 February 1998

A multicenter, randomized, controlled, investigator-blind study was performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of oral cefdinir versus oral penicillin V for the treatment of pharyngitis due to group A beta-hemolytic streptococci (GABHS). Patients 13 years of age and older were randomized to receive either oral cefdinir (300 mg twice a day) for 5 days followed by placebo for 5 days or oral penicillin V (250 mg four times a day) for 10 days. Throat cultures were obtained, and signs and symptoms of pharyngitis were recorded at study admission and follow-up visits on study days 11 to 15, 16 to 20, and 25 to 31. Patients kept a diary to record medication intake and their assessment of throat pain at admission and at each day of study treatment. Five hundred fifty-eight patients were enrolled, of whom 432 (77.4%) were clinically and microbiologically evaluable. The GABHS eradication rates 5 to 10 days after completion of therapy were 193 of 218 (88.5%) in the cefdinir group and 176 of 214 (82.2%) in the penicillin group (P = 0.053). Clinical cure rates were 89.0 and 84.6%, respectively (P = 0.80). By the time of the long-term follow-up visit, 2 to 3 weeks after completion of treatment, 156 of 191 (81.7%) of the assessable cefdinir patients and 152 of 195 (77.9%) of the penicillin patients remained free of GABHS. Both treatments were well tolerated, with adverse reaction rates of 18.3% in the cefdinir study arm and 15.0% in the penicillin study arm (P = 0.278). Five-day treatment with cefdinir is safe and effective therapy for GABHS pharyngitis. Based on its twice-a-day dosage and shorter course of therapy, leading to potentially greater patient compliance, cefdinir may be considered for use in the treatment of pharyngitis caused by GABHS.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Parke-Davis Pharmaceutical Research, Division of Warner-Lambert Company, 2800 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48105. Phone: (734) 998-5814. Fax: (734) 996-7266. E-mail: tackk{at}aa.wl.com.

dagger The members of the Cefdinir Pediatric Pharyngitis Study Group are as follows: Jeffrey M. Adelglass, Carrolton, Tex.; Ross Black, Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio; Bert Cochran, San Luis Obispo, Calif.; Harry Collins, Edison, N.J.; Jill Downing, Framingham, Mass.; Margaret Drehobl, San Diego, Calif.; Victor Elinoff, Endwell, N.J.; W. Manford Gooch, Salt Lake City, Utah; Randall Gore, Portland, Oreg.; James Hedrick, Bardstown, Ky.; Daniel C. Henry, Salt Lake City, Utah; Lance Kirkegaard, Tacoma, Wash.; Thomas W. Littlejohn, Winston-Salem, N.C.; Frank Mazzone, San Luis Obispo, Calif.; James McCarty, Fresno, Calif.; Dennis McCluskey, Mogadore, Ohio; John Ondrejicka, Jacksonville Beach, Fla.; R. Zorba Pastor, Oregon, Wis.; Anthony D. Puopolo, Milford, Mass.; Sam Roberts, Alabaster, Ala.; Jerry D. Smucker, Columbus, Ohio; Malcolm J. Sperling, Fountain Valley, Calif.; and Sandra Wiederhold, Kalamazoo, Mich.


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, May 1998, p. 1073-1075, Vol. 42, No. 5
0066-4804/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Falagas, M. E., Vouloumanou, E. K., Matthaiou, D. K., Kapaskelis, A. M., Karageorgopoulos, D. E. (2008). Effectiveness and Safety of Short-Course vs Long-Course Antibiotic Therapy for Group A {beta}-Hemolytic Streptococcal Tonsillopharyngitis: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials. Mayo Clin Proc. 83: 880-889 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Casey, J. R. (2007). Selecting the Optimal Antibiotic in the Treatment of Group A {beta}-Hemolytic Streptococci Pharyngitis. CLIN PEDIATR 46: 25S-35S [Abstract]  
  • Marcy, S. M. (2007). Treatment Options for Streptococcal Pharyngitis. CLIN PEDIATR 46: 36S-45S [Abstract]  
  • Block, S. L. (2003). Short-Course Antimicrobial Therapy of Streptococcal Pharyngitis. CLIN PEDIATR 42: 663-671