Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, May 1998, p. 1139-1145, Vol. 42, No. 5
Division of Infectious
Diseases,1
Comprehensive Cancer
Center,11 and
Department of Pediatrics,
Received 15 September 1997/Returned for modification 18 December
1997/Accepted 17 February 1998
The present randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled,
multicenter clinical trial was designed to compare the efficacy and
tolerability of sorivudine
[1-
0066-4804/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Sorivudine versus Acyclovir for Treatment of Dermatomal Herpes
Zoster in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Patients: Results
from a Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial

-D-arabinofuranosyl-E-(2-bromovinyl)uracil] and
acyclovir for the treatment of dermatomal herpes zoster in human
immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-seropositive patients. A total of 170 HIV-seropositive adults presenting with herpes zoster (confirmed by
direct fluorescent-antigen testing and/or viral culture) were enrolled
and randomized to receive a 10-day course of orally administered sorivudine (40 mg once daily plus acyclovir placebos) or acyclovir (800 mg five times daily plus sorivudine placebo). Patients were monitored
daily to document the events of cutaneous healing, pain, zoster-related
complications, and drug-related adverse events. Patients were
reassessed on days 21 and 28 and then once monthly for 1 year. The
primary efficacy endpoint was time to the cessation of new vesicle
formation. Secondary efficacy endpoints included times to other events
of cutaneous healing, resolution of pain, and frequency of
dissemination and zoster recurrence. In a multivariate analysis,
sorivudine was superior to acyclovir for reducing the times to the
cessation of new vesicle formation (relative risk [RR] = 1.54, 95%
confidence interval [CI] = 1.00 to 2.36; P = 0.049)
and total lesion crusting (RR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.07 to 2.04;
P = 0.017). In a univariate analysis, there was a
trend favoring sorivudine for the cessation of new vesicle formation (median of 3 versus 4 days; P = 0.07) and a
significant advantage for time to total lesion crusting (median of 7 versus 8 days; P = 0.02). The time to the resolution
of zoster-associated pain, the frequency of dissemination, and the
frequency of zoster recurrence were not different between the two
treatment groups. Both drugs were well tolerated. Sorivudine is an
effective drug for the treatment of herpes zoster in HIV-infected
patients and results in accelerated cutaneous healing when compared
with acyclovir therapy.
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Division of
Infectious Diseases, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 845 19th St. South, Birmingham, AL 35294-2170. Phone: (205) 934-2366. Fax: (205)
975-5718. E-mail: jgnann{at}uabid.dom.uab.edu.
Present address: Quest Clinical Research, San Francisco, CA
94115.
Investigators in the CASG/ACTG Herpes Zoster Study Group are
listed in the Appendix.
This article has been cited by other articles:
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»