This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rayner, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Spicer, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rayner, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Spicer, W. J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, June 1998, p. 1370-1374, Vol. 42, No. 6
0066-4804/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Initial Concentration-Time Profile of Gentamicin Determines Efficacy against Enterobacter cloacae ATCC 13047

Craig R. Rayner,1,2 Lisa L. Ioannides-Demos,1,* Jo-Anne E. Brien,2 Lisa L. Liolios,3 and W. John Spicer3

Departments of Pharmacy1 and Microbiology and Infectious Diseases,3 Alfred Healthcare Group, Prahran, Victoria 3181, and Department of Pharmacy Practice, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria 3052,2 Australia

Received 27 May 1997/Returned for modification 11 November 1997/Accepted 10 February 1998

In vitro studies were designed to investigate the influence of peak drug concentration (Cmax), the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), and, consequently, the trough concentration on the bactericidal effects of gentamicin against Enterobacter cloacae (MIC, 0.5 mg/liter) by simulating bolus versus infusion administration and bolus dosing with altered drug clearance. Bacteria in the lag phase were exposed to gentamicin concentration-time profiles modelling either bolus or infusion dosing (AUC constant, Cmax changing) with 30-min postdose peak concentrations (Cpeak30) of 4, 6, 8, and 10 mg/liter or bolus dosing with normal and double drug clearance (Cmax constant, AUC changing) corresponding to normal clearance profiles with Cpeak30 of 6 and 8 mg/liter. Exposure to gentamicin caused early bactericidal effects apparent by 2 h, followed by variable bacteriostatic and recovery phases. Exposure to bolus profiles resulted in greater bactericidal activity than the corresponding infusion profile up to a Cpeak30 of 8 mg/liter. At a Cpeak30 of 10 mg/liter, there were no differences in bactericidal effect. Double clearance profiles had a reduced bactericidal effect at 6 mg/liter compared to the corresponding normal clearance profile, but no differences in bactericidal effect were observed for 8-mg/liter double and normal clearance profiles. These results suggest that the initial exposure (i.e., 0 to 30 min) is a more important determinant for bacterial killing than the AUC or trough concentration for this bacterium. Subject to confirmation of these findings with other gram-negative bacteria, to optimize aminoglycoside efficacy the initial exposure (Cmax) should be maximized by giving higher doses or bolus administration at intervals which may not produce detectable trough concentrations. Clinical trials with a broad range of patients, especially those with higher clearance, would confirm these in vitro observations and define optimal dosing recommendations.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Alfred Hospital, Commercial Rd., Prahran, Victoria 3181, Australia. Phone: 61-03-9276-3578. Fax: 61-03-9276-2404. E-mail: L.demos{at}alfred.edu.au.


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, June 1998, p. 1370-1374, Vol. 42, No. 6
0066-4804/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Burkhardt, O., Lehmann, C., Madabushi, R., Kumar, V., Derendorf, H., Welte, T. (2006). Once-daily tobramycin in cystic fibrosis: better for clinical outcome than thrice-daily tobramycin but more resistance development?. J Antimicrob Chemother 58: 822-829 [Abstract] [Full Text]