Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, August 1998, p. 1959-1965, Vol. 42, No. 8
0066-4804/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Division of Infectious Diseases,
Received 19 November 1997/Returned for modification 9 February
1998/Accepted 11 May 1998
Nitazoxanide (NTZ), a drug currently being tested in human clinical
trials for efficacy against chronic cryptosporidiosis, was assessed in
cell culture and in two animal models. The inhibitory activity of NTZ
was compared with that of paromomycin (PRM), a drug that is partially
effective against Cryptosporidium parvum. A concentration
of 10 µg of NTZ/ml (32 µM) consistently reduced parasite growth in
cell culture by more than 90% with little evidence of drug-associated
cytotoxicity, in contrast to an 80% reduction produced by PRM at 2,000 µg/ml (3.2 mM). In contrast to its efficacy in vitro, NTZ at either
100 or 200 mg/kg of body weight/day for 10 days was ineffective at
reducing the parasite burden in C. parvum-infected,
anti-gamma-interferon-conditioned SCID mice. Combined treatment with
NTZ and PRM was no more effective than treatment with PRM alone.
Finally, NTZ was partially effective at reducing the parasite burden in
a gnotobiotic piglet diarrhea model when given orally for 11 days at
250 mg/kg/day but not at 125 mg/kg/day. However, the higher dose of NTZ
induced a drug-related diarrhea in piglets that might have influenced
its therapeutic efficacy. As we have previously reported, PRM was
effective at markedly reducing the parasite burden in piglets at a
dosage of 500 mg/kg/day. Our results indicate that of all of the models tested, the piglet diarrhea model most closely mimics the partial response to NTZ treatment reported to occur in patients with chronic cryptosporidiosis.
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Division of
Infectious Diseases, Tufts University School of Veterinary Medicine,
200 Westboro Rd., Building 20, North Grafton, MA 01536. Phone: (508) 839-7955. Fax: (508) 839-7977. E-mail:
stzipori{at}infonet.tufts.edu.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. |
|---|---|
| J. Clin. Microbiol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |