This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kinzig-Schippers, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sörgel, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kinzig-Schippers, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sörgel, F.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, September 1998, p. 2359-2364, Vol. 42, No. 9
0066-4804/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Absence of Effect of Rufloxacin on Theophylline Pharmacokinetics in Steady Statedagger

Martina Kinzig-Schippers,1 Uwe Fuhr,2,3 Marina Cesana,4 Carola Müller,1 A. Horst Staib,2 S. Rietbrock,3 and Fritz Sörgel1,5,*

IBMP-Institute for Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Research, 90562 Nürnberg-Heroldsberg,1 Institute for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital, 60590 Frankfurt am Main,2 Institute for Pharmacology of the University, Clinical Pharmacology, 50924 Cologne,3 and Institute of Pharmacology, University of Essen, Essen,5 Germany, and Mediolanum Farmaceutici, Milan, Italy4

Received 10 November 1997/Returned for modification 31 March 1998/Accepted 10 June 1998

Several quinolone antibacterial agents are known to inhibit the metabolism of theophylline, with the potential to cause adverse events due to raised theophylline concentrations during coadministration. A randomized crossover study was therefore conducted with 12 healthy male volunteers (ages, 23 to 34 years; body weight, 64 to 101 kg) to evaluate a possible interaction between rufloxacin and theophylline. Both drugs were administered at steady state. Following the administration of an oral loading dose of 400 mg on day 1, rufloxacin was given orally at 200 mg once daily on days 2 to 7 during one period only. During both periods, 146 mg of theophylline was administered orally twice daily for 3 days (which were days 4 to 6 of the rufloxacin coadministration period) and intravenously once the next morning to test for an interaction. Theophylline and rufloxacin concentrations were measured by reversed-phase high-pressure liquid chromatography, the pharmacokinetics of theophylline at steady state following administration of the last dose were calculated by compartment-model-independent methods. To compare the treatments, analysis of variance-based point estimates and 90% confidence intervals (given in parentheses) were calculated for the mean ratios of the pharmacokinetic parameters from the test (rufloxacin coadministration) over those from the reference (theophylline without rufloxacin) period. These were as follows: maximum concentration at steady state, 1.01 (0.96 to 1.07); area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 h, 0.98 (0.94 to 1.02); half-life, 0.99 (0.95 to 1.03); total clearance at steady state, 1.02 (0.99 to 1.06); and volume of distribution in the elimination phase, 1.01 (0.97 to 1.05). In conclusion, rufloxacin did not affect theophylline pharmacokinetics at steady state. Therefore, therapeutic coadministration of rufloxacin and theophylline is not expected to cause an increased incidence of theophylline-related adverse events.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: IBMP, Schleifweg 3, 90562 Nürnberg-Heroldsberg, Germany. Phone: 49-9 11-5 18 29-0. Fax: 49-9 11-5 18 29-20. E-mail: ibmp{at}osn.de.

dagger This work is dedicated to Marika Geldmacher-von Mallinckrodt, professor emeritus and former head of the Division of Forensic Toxicology of the University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany, on the occasion of her 75th birthday.


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, September 1998, p. 2359-2364, Vol. 42, No. 9
0066-4804/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.