Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, January 1999, p. 169-171, Vol. 43, No. 1
Department of Pathology, University of Iowa College of
Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa1;
Mycotic
Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta,
Georgia2;
Mycology Reference Laboratory,
Center for Medical Mycology, Department of Dermatology, Case Western
Reserve University and University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland,
Ohio3;
University of California San
Francisco, San Francisco, California4; and
Uganda Cancer Institute, Kampala, Uganda5
Received 5 June 1998/Returned for modification 18 September
1998/Accepted 9 October 1998
We investigated the in vitro activity of voriconazole compared to
those of fluconazole and itraconazole against 566 clinical isolates of
Cryptococcus neoformans from Africa (164) and the United
States (402). Isolates were obtained from cerebrospinal fluid (362),
blood (139), and miscellaneous sites (65). Voriconazole (MIC at which
90% of the isolates are inhibited [MIC90], 0.12 to 0.25 µg/ml) was more active than either itraconazole (MIC90, 0.5 µg/ml) or fluconazole (MIC90, 8.0 to 16 µg/ml)
against both African and U.S. isolates. Isolates inhibited by
0066-4804/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
In Vitro Activities of Voriconazole, Fluconazole, and
Itraconazole against 566 Clinical Isolates of Cryptococcus
neoformans from the United States and Africa
16 µg
of fluconazole per ml were almost all (99%) inhibited by
1 µg of
voriconazole per ml. These results suggest that voriconazole may be
useful in the treatment of cryptococcosis.
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Medical
Microbiology Division, Department of Pathology, C606 GH, University of
Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA 52242. Phone: (319) 384-9566 or
335-8170. Fax: (319) 356-4916. E-mail:
mpfaller{at}blue.weeg.uiowa.edu.
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. |
|---|---|
| J. Clin. Microbiol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |