This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Del Poeta, M.
Right arrow Articles by Perfect, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Del Poeta, M.
Right arrow Articles by Perfect, J. R.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, December 1999, p. 2862-2868, Vol. 43, No. 12
0066-4804/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Comparison of In Vitro Activities of Camptothecin and Nitidine Derivatives against Fungal and Cancer Cells

Maurizio Del Poeta,1,2 Shih-Fong Chen,3 Daniel Von Hoff,3 Christine C. Dykstra,4 Mansukh C. Wani,5 Govindarajan Manikumar,5 Joseph Heitman,1,6,7,8,9 Monroe E. Wall,5 and John R. Perfect1,8,*

Departments of Medicine,1 Genetics,6 Pharmacology and Cancer Biology,7 and Microbiology,8 and Howard Hughes Medical Institute,9 Duke University Medical Center, and Department of Chemistry and Life Sciences, Research Triangle Institute,5 Durham, North Carolina; Institute of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, University of Ancona, Ospedale Umberto I, 60121 Ancona, Italy2; Institute for Drug Development, Cancer Therapy and Research Center, San Antonio, Texas3; and Department of Pathobiology, Auburn University, Alabama4

Received 5 April 1999/Returned for modification 13 August 1999/Accepted 13 September 1999

The activities of a series of camptothecin and nitidine derivatives that might interact with topoisomerase I were compared against yeast and cancer cell lines. Our findings reveal that structural modifications to camptothecin derivatives have profound effects on the topoisomerase I-drug poison complex in cells. Although the water-soluble anticancer agents topotecan and irinotecan are less active than the original structure, camptothecin, other derivatives or analogs with substitutions that increase compound solubility have also increased antifungal activities. In fact, a water-soluble prodrug appears to penetrate into the cell and release its active form; the resulting effect in complex with Cryptococcus neoformans topoisomerase I is a fungicidal response and also potent antitumor activity. Some of the compounds that are not toxic to wild-type yeast cells are extremely toxic to the yeast cells when the C. neoformans topoisomerase I target is overexpressed. With the known antifungal mechanism of a camptothecin-topoisomerase I complex as a cellular poison, these findings indicate that drug entry may be extremely important for antifungal activity. Nitidine chloride exhibits antifungal activity against yeast cells through a mechanism(s) other than topoisomerase I and appears to be less active than camptothecin analogs against tumor cells. Finally, some camptothecin analogs exhibit synergistic antifungal activity against yeast cells in combination with amphotericin B in vitro. Our results suggest that camptothecin and/or nitidine derivatives can exhibit potent antifungal activity and that the activities of camptothecin derivatives with existing antifungal drugs may be synergistic against pathogenic fungi. These new compounds, which exhibit potent antitumor activities, will likely require further structural changes to find more selective activity against fungal versus mammalian cells to hold promise as a new class of antifungal agents.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Duke University Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and International Health, P.O. Box 3353, Durham, NC 27710. Phone: (919) 684-2660. Fax: (919) 684-8902. E-mail: perfe001{at}mc.duke.edu.


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, December 1999, p. 2862-2868, Vol. 43, No. 12
0066-4804/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • de la Loza, M. C. D., Wellinger, R. E. (2009). A novel approach for organelle-specific DNA damage targeting reveals different susceptibility of mitochondrial DNA to the anticancer drugs camptothecin and topotecan. Nucleic Acids Res 37: e26-e26 [Abstract] [Full Text]