This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schoevers, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Niewold, T. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schoevers, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Niewold, T. A.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, September 1999, p. 2138-2143, Vol. 43, No. 9
0066-4804/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Effects of Enrofloxacin on Porcine Phagocytic Function

E. J. Schoevers,1 L. A. M. G. van Leengoed,1 J. H. M. Verheijden,1 and T. A. Niewold2,*

Department of Herd Health and Reproduction, University of Utrecht, Utrecht,1 and Institute for Animal Science and Health (ID-DLO), Lelystad,2 The Netherlands

Received 18 June 1998/Returned for modification 22 September 1998/Accepted 29 June 1999

The interaction between enrofloxacin and porcine phagocytes was studied with clinically relevant concentrations of enrofloxacin. Enrofloxacin accumulated in phagocytes, with cellular concentration/extracellular concentration ratios of 9 for polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) and 5 for alveolar macrophages (AMs). Cells with accumulated enrofloxacin brought into enrofloxacin-free medium released approximately 80% (AMs) to 90% (PMNs) of their enrofloxacin within the first 10 min, after which no further release was seen. Enrofloxacin affected neither the viability of PMNs and AMs nor the chemotaxis of PMNs at concentrations ranging from 0 to 10 µg/ml. Enrofloxacin (0.5 µg/ml) did not alter the capability of PMNs and AMs to phagocytize fluorescent microparticles or Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, Pasteurella multocida, and Staphylococcus aureus. Significant differences in intracellular killing were seen with enrofloxacin at 5× the MIC compared with that for controls not treated with enrofloxacin. PMNs killed all S. aureus isolates in 3 h with or without enrofloxacin. Intracellular S. aureus isolates in AMs were less susceptible than extracellular S. aureus isolates to the bactericidal effect of enrofloxacin. P. multocida was not phagocytosed by PMNs. AMs did not kill P. multocida, and similar intra- and extracellular reductions of P. multocida isolates by enrofloxacin were found. Intraphagocytic killing of A. pleuropneumoniae was significantly enhanced by enrofloxacin at 5× the MIC in both PMNs and AMs. AMs are very susceptible to the A. pleuropneumoniae cytotoxin. This suggests that in serologically naive pigs the enhancing effect of enrofloxacin on the bactericidal action of PMNs may have clinical relevance.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institute for Animal Science and Health (ID-DLO), P.O. Box 65, NL-8200AB Lelystad, The Netherlands. Phone: 31 320 238238. Fax: 31 320 238050. E-mail: t.a.niewold{at}id.dlo.nl.


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, September 1999, p. 2138-2143, Vol. 43, No. 9
0066-4804/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Khalifeh, M. S., Amawi, M. M., Abu-Basha, E. A., Yonis, I. B. (2009). Assessment of humoral and cellular-mediated immune response in chickens treated with tilmicosin, florfenicol, or enrofloxacin at the time of Newcastle disease vaccination. Poult. Sci. 88: 2118-2124 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Sjolund, M, de la Fuente, A. J. M., Fossum, C., Wallgren, P. (2009). Responses of pigs to a re-challenge with Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae after being treated with different antimicrobials following their initial exposure. Vet Rec. 164: 550-555 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Niewold, T. A. (2007). The Nonantibiotic Anti-Inflammatory Effect of Antimicrobial Growth Promoters, the Real Mode of Action? A Hypothesis. Poult. Sci. 86: 605-609 [Abstract] [Full Text]