This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lenaerts, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Cynamon, M. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lenaerts, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Cynamon, M. H.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, November 2000, p. 3167-3168, Vol. 44, No. 11
0066-4804/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Evaluation of Rifalazil in a Combination Treatment Regimen as an Alternative to Isoniazid-Rifampin Therapy in a Mouse Tuberculosis Model

Anne M. Lenaerts, Sharon E. Chase, and Michael H. Cynamon*

Departments of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Medical Center and State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York 13210

Received 22 June 2000/Returned for modification 6 July 2000/Accepted 2 August 2000

The newer rifamycin, rifalazil (RLZ) (previously known as KRM-1648), has been shown in prior experiments to be a highly potent drug against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. In this report, we studied the efficacy of RLZ in combination with pyrazinamide (PZA) and ethambutol (EMB) in a long-term in vivo experiment and compared their activity with the isoniazid (INH)-rifampin (RIF) combination which is presently used in the clinic. Combinations of RLZ with PZA alone or with both PZA and EMB were both found to have sterilizing activities comparable to that of the INH-RIF combination but significantly better activity with respect to relapse of infection. These results suggest that RLZ, or other agents with similar activity, could be combined with available agents to act as a potential alternative drug regimen to the currently used INH-RIF combination.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: VAMC, 800 Irving Ave., Syracuse, NY 13210. Phone: (315) 476-7461, ext. 3324. Fax: (315) 476-5348. E-mail: Michael.Cynamon{at}med.va.gov.


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, November 2000, p. 3167-3168, Vol. 44, No. 11
0066-4804/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Woolhiser, L. K., Hoff, D. R., Marietta, K. S., Orme, I. M., Lenaerts, A. J. (2009). Testing of Experimental Compounds in a Relapse Model of Tuberculosis Using Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Gene-Disrupted Mice. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53: 306-308 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Anton, P. M., O'Brien, M., Kokkotou, E., Eisenstein, B., Michaelis, A., Rothstein, D., Paraschos, S., Kelly, C. P., Pothoulakis, C. (2004). Rifalazil Treats and Prevents Relapse of Clostridium difficile-Associated Diarrhea in Hamsters. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48: 3975-3979 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Iseman, M.D. (2002). Tuberculosis therapy: past, present and future. Eur Respir J 20: 87S-94s [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Tuberculosis Drug Screening Program, (2001). Search for New Drugs for Treatment of Tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45: 1943-1946 [Full Text]