Previous Article | Next Article 
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, November 2000, p. 3213-3216, Vol. 44, No. 11
0066-4804/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Low Level of Cross-Resistance to Amprenavir (141W94) in Samples
from Patients Pretreated with Other Protease Inhibitors
Barbara
Schmidt,1,*
Klaus
Korn,1
Brigitte
Moschik,1
Christiane
Paatz,1
Klaus
Überla,2 and
Hauke
Walter1
Institute of Clinical and Molecular Virology,
German National Reference Centre for Retroviruses, University of
Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen,1 and
Institute of Virology, University of Leipzig,
Leipzig,2 Germany
Received 20 December 1999/Returned for modification 7 April
2000/Accepted 31 July 2000
The therapeutic success of an antiretroviral salvage regimen
containing protease inhibitors (PI) is limited by PI-resistant viral
strains exhibiting various degrees of resistance and cross-resistance. To evaluate the extent of cross-resistance to the new PI amprenavir, 155 samples from 132 human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected patients were analyzed for viral genotype by direct sequencing of the
protease gene. Concomitantly, drug sensitivity to indinavir, saquinavir, ritonavir, nelfinavir, and amprenavir was analyzed by a
recombinant virus assay. A total of 111 patients had been pretreated
with 1-4 PI, but all were naive to amprenavir. A total of 105 samples
(67.7%) were sensitive to amprenavir; 25 samples (16.1%) were
intermediately resistant, and another 25 samples were highly resistant
(4- to 8-fold- and >8-fold-reduced sensitivity, respectively). The
mutations 46I/L, 54L/V, 84V, and 90M showed the strongest association
with amprenavir resistance (P < 0.0001). The scoring
system using 84V and/or any two of a number of mutations (10I/R/V/F,
46I/L, 54L/V, and 90M) predicted amprenavir resistance with a
sensitivity of 86.0% and a specificity of 81.0% within the analyzed
group of samples. Of 62 samples with resistance against 4 PI, 23 (37.1%) were still sensitive to amprenavir. In
comparison, only 2 of 23 samples (8.7%) from nelfinavir-naive
patients with resistance against indinavir, saquinavir, and ritonavir
were still sensitive to nelfinavir. Amprenavir thus appears to be an
interesting alternative for PI salvage therapy.
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institute of
Clinical and Molecular Virology, German National Reference Centre for Retroviruses, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Schlossgarten 4, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany. Phone: 49-9131-85-24010. Fax:
49-9131-85-26485. E-mail:
baschmid{at}viro.med.uni-erlangen.de.
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, November 2000, p. 3213-3216, Vol. 44, No. 11
0066-4804/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Hester, E K., Chandler, H. V, Sims, K. M
(2006). Fosamprenavir: Drug Development for Adherence. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy
40: 1301-1310
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Justesen, U. S., Klitgaard, N. A., Brosen, K., Pedersen, C.
(2004). Dose-dependent pharmacokinetics of delavirdine in combination with amprenavir in healthy volunteers. J Antimicrob Chemother
54: 206-210
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Paulsen, D., Elston, R., Snowden, W., Tisdale, M., Ross, L.
(2003). Differentiation of genotypic resistance profiles for amprenavir and lopinavir, a valuable aid for choice of therapy in protease inhibitor-experienced HIV-1-infected subjects. J Antimicrob Chemother
52: 319-323
[Full Text]
-
Marcelin, A.-G., Lamotte, C., Delaugerre, C., Ktorza, N., Ait Mohand, H., Cacace, R., Bonmarchand, M., Wirden, M., Simon, A., Bossi, P., Bricaire, F., Costagliola, D., Katlama, C., Peytavin, G., Calvez, V.
(2003). Genotypic Inhibitory Quotient as Predictor of Virological Response to Ritonavir-Amprenavir in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Protease Inhibitor-Experienced Patients. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
47: 594-600
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hammer, S. M., Vaida, F., Bennett, K. K., Holohan, M. K., Sheiner, L., Eron, J. J., Wheat, L. J., Mitsuyasu, R. T., Gulick, R. M., Valentine, F. T., Aberg, J. A., Rogers, M. D., Karol, C. N., Saah, A. J., Lewis, R. H., Bessen, L. J., Brosgart, C., DeGruttola, V., Mellors, J. W., for the AIDS Clinical Trials Group 398 Study Team,
(2002). Dual vs Single Protease Inhibitor Therapy Following Antiretroviral Treatment Failure: A Randomized Trial. JAMA
288: 169-180
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Beerenwinkel, N., Schmidt, B., Walter, H., Kaiser, R., Lengauer, T., Hoffmann, D., Korn, K., Selbig, J.
(2002). Diversity and complexity of HIV-1 drug resistance: A bioinformatics approach to predicting phenotype from genotype. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
99: 8271-8276
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Shafer, R. W.
(2002). Genotypic Testing for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Drug Resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
15: 247-277
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Maguire, M., Shortino, D., Klein, A., Harris, W., Manohitharajah, V., Tisdale, M., Elston, R., Yeo, J., Randall, S., Xu, F., Parker, H., May, J., Snowden, W.
(2002). Emergence of Resistance to Protease Inhibitor Amprenavir in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1-Infected Patients: Selection of Four Alternative Viral Protease Genotypes and Influence of Viral Susceptibility to Coadministered Reverse Transcriptase Nucleoside Inhibitors. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
46: 731-738
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Duval, X., Lamotte, C., Race, E., Descamps, D., Damond, F., Clavel, F., Leport, C., Peytavin, G., Vilde, J.-L.
(2002). Amprenavir Inhibitory Quotient and Virological Response in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Patients on an Amprenavir-Containing Salvage Regimen without or with Ritonavir. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
46: 570-574
[Abstract]
[Full Text]