This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Lalla, F.
Right arrow Articles by Fabris, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Lalla, F.
Right arrow Articles by Fabris, P.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, February 2000, p. 316-319, Vol. 44, No. 2
0066-4804/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Regional Prophylaxis with Teicoplanin in Monolateral or Bilateral Total Knee Replacement: an Open Study

Fausto de Lalla,1,* Renato Viola,2,dagger Giampietro Pellizzer,1 Luca Lazzarini,1 Andrea Tramarin,1 and Paolo Fabris1

Department of Infectious Diseases, San Bortolo Hospital,1 and Center for Knee Surgery, Sandrigo Hospital,2 Vicenza, Italy

Received 9 August 1999/Returned for modification 21 September 1999/Accepted 3 November 1999

From January 1991 to June 1997, patients undergoing primary elective monolateral or bilateral total knee replacement (TKR) were consecutively enrolled in a prospective, open clinical study on the efficacy and safety of regional prophylaxis with teicoplanin (TEC). Those scheduled for monolateral TKR (115 patients) received 400 mg of TEC in 100 ml of saline as a 5-min infusion into a foot vein of the leg to be operated on immediately after the tourniquet was inflated to 400 mm Hg (ca. 50 kPa). For patients undergoing bilateral surgery (45 patients), regional administration of TEC was also repeated for the second knee operation. Follow-up ranged from a minimum of 2 years to 8 years. None of the patients experienced local or systemic adverse effects following regional administration of TEC. In the immediate postoperative and 2-year follow-up periods, only one superficial infection of the primary site attributable to intraoperative contamination (prophylaxis failure) out of the 205 prostheses implanted was observed. Deep infections involving the prosthesis did not occur. Infectious complications at distant sites were observed in nine cases (urinary tract infection due to Escherichia coli in eight cases, and Salmonella enteritidis gastroenteritis in one case) in the immediate postoperative period; they all were rapidly cured after antibiotic treatment. A delayed prosthetic infection, related to hematogenous spread of the etiological agent and therefore not considered a prophylactic failure, was observed in a patient who had undergone TKR 5 years before. Regional administration of TEC in monolateral and bilateral TKR appears to be a safe and valuable prophylactic technique.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Divisione Malattie Infettive, Ospedale San Bortolo, via Rodolfi, 36100 Vicenza, Italy. Phone: 39 0444 993998. Fax: 39 0444 993616. E-mail: fdl.vi{at}gpnet.it.

dagger Present address: Department of Orthopedics, Ospedale Civile, Campo SS. Giovanni e Paolo, Venezia, Italy.


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, February 2000, p. 316-319, Vol. 44, No. 2
0066-4804/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • AlBuhairan, B., Hind, D., Hutchinson, A. (2008). Antibiotic prophylaxis for wound infections in total joint arthroplasty: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90-B: 915-919 [Abstract] [Full Text]