Previous Article | Next Article 
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, April 2000, p. 967-971, Vol. 44, No. 4
0066-4804/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Macrolide Resistance Genes in
Enterococcus spp.
Aránzazu
Portillo,1
Fernanda
Ruiz-Larrea,1
Myriam
Zarazaga,1
Ana
Alonso,2
Jose Luis
Martinez,2 and
Carmen
Torres1,*
Area Bioquímica y Biología
Molecular, Universidad de La Rioja, 26004 Logroño,1 and Centro Nacional de
Biotecnología, Campus UAM, Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid,2 Spain
Received 15 July 1999/Returned for modification 10 November
1999/Accepted 30 December 1999
Seventy-eight isolates of different Enterococcus
species (E. faecalis, n = 27; E. faecium, n = 23; E. durans,
n = 8; E. avium, n = 6;
E. hirae, n = 9; E. gallinarum, n = 3; and E. casseliflavus, n = 2) with a variety of
erythromycin resistance phenotypes were examined for the presence of
macrolide resistance genes (ermA, ermB,
ermC, ermTR, mefA/E, and
msrA). Positive PCR amplifications of ermB were
obtained for 39 of 40 highly erythromycin-resistant Enterococcus isolates (MICs, >128 µg/ml) of different
species; the remaining highly resistant E. faecium isolate
was positive for PCR amplification of ermA but was negative
for PCR amplification of the ermB and ermC
genes. For all enterococcal strains for which erythromycin MICs were
32 µg/ml PCRs were negative for erm methylase genes.
For all E. faecium isolates PCR amplified products of the expected size of 400 bp were obtained when msrA primers
were used, with the results being independent of the erythromycin
resistance phenotype. All the other enterococcal species gave negative
results by msrA PCRs. Sequencing of the msrA
PCR products from either erythromycin-susceptible, low-level-resistant,
or highly resistant E. faecium strains showed that the
amplicons did not correspond to the msrA gene described for
Staphylococcus epidermidis but corresponded to a new
putative efflux determinant, which showed 62% identity with the
msrA gene at the DNA level and 72% similarity at the amino
acid level. This new gene was named msrC.
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Area de
Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Avenida de la Paz 105, Universidad de La Rioja, 26004 Logroño, Spain. Phone:
34-941-299284. Fax: 34-941-299274. E-mail:
carmen.torres{at}daa.unirioja.es.
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, April 2000, p. 967-971, Vol. 44, No. 4
0066-4804/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Schwaiger, K., Bauer, J.
(2008). Detection of the Erythromycin rRNA Methylase Gene erm(A) in Enterococcus faecalis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
52: 2994-2995
[Full Text]
-
Vankerckhoven, V., Huys, G., Vancanneyt, M., Snauwaert, C., Swings, J., Klare, I., Witte, W., Van Autgaerden, T., Chapelle, S., Lammens, C., Goossens, H.
(2008). Genotypic Diversity, Antimicrobial Resistance, and Virulence Factors of Human Isolates and Probiotic Cultures Constituting Two Intraspecific Groups of Enterococcus faecium Isolates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
74: 4247-4255
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
DiPersio, L. P., DiPersio, J. R., Frey, K. C., Beach, J. A.
(2008). Prevalence of the erm(T) Gene in Clinical Isolates of Erythromycin-Resistant Group D Streptococcus and Enterococcus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
52: 1567-1569
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Poole, K.
(2005). Efflux-mediated antimicrobial resistance. J Antimicrob Chemother
56: 20-51
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Aakra, A., Vebo, H., Snipen, L., Hirt, H., Aastveit, A., Kapur, V., Dunny, G., Murray, B., Nes, I. F.
(2005). Transcriptional Response of Enterococcus faecalis V583 to Erythromycin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
49: 2246-2259
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
De Leener, E., Martel, A., De Graef, E. M., Top, J., Butaye, P., Haesebrouck, F., Willems, R., Decostere, A.
(2005). Molecular Analysis of Human, Porcine, and Poultry Enterococcus faecium Isolates and Their erm(B) Genes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
71: 2766-2770
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Klaassen, C. H. W., Mouton, J. W.
(2005). Molecular Detection of the Macrolide Efflux Gene: To Discriminate or Not To Discriminate between mef(A) and mef(E). Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
49: 1271-1278
[Full Text]
-
Min, Y.-H., Jeong, J.-H., Choi, Y.-J., Yun, H.-J., Lee, K., Shim, M.-J., Kwak, J.-H., Choi, E.-C.
(2003). Heterogeneity of Macrolide-Lincosamide-Streptogramin B Resistance Phenotypes in Enterococci. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
47: 3415-3420
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sjolund, M., Wreiber, K., Andersson, D. I., Blaser, M. J., Engstrand, L.
(2003). Long-Term Persistence of Resistant Enterococcus Species after Antibiotics To Eradicate Helicobacter pylori. ANN INTERN MED
139: 483-487
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Butaye, P., Devriese, L. A., Haesebrouck, F.
(2003). Antimicrobial Growth Promoters Used in Animal Feed: Effects of Less Well Known Antibiotics on Gram-Positive Bacteria. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
16: 175-188
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lim, J.-A., Kwon, A.-R., Kim, S.-K., Chong, Y., Lee, K., Choi, E.-C.
(2002). Prevalence of resistance to macrolide, lincosamide and streptogramin antibiotics in Gram-positive cocci isolated in a Korean hospital. J Antimicrob Chemother
49: 489-495
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Werner, G., Hildebrandt, B., Witte ;, W., Murray, B. E., Singh, K. V.
(2001). The Newly Described msrC Gene Is Not Equally Distributed among All Isolates of Enterococcus faecium. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
45: 3672-3673
[Full Text]
-
Singh, K. V., Malathum, K., Murray, B. E.
(2001). Disruption of an Enterococcus faecium Species-Specific Gene, a Homologue of Acquired Macrolide Resistance Genes of Staphylococci, Is Associated with an Increase in Macrolide Susceptibility. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
45: 263-266
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tait-Kamradt, A., Davies, T., Appelbaum, P. C., Depardieu, F., Courvalin, P., Petitpas, J., Wondrack, L., Walker, A., Jacobs, M. R., Sutcliffe, J.
(2000). Two New Mechanisms of Macrolide Resistance in Clinical Strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae from Eastern Europe and North America. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
44: 3395-3401
[Abstract]
[Full Text]