Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, May 2000, p. 1163-1167, Vol. 44, No. 5
University Children's Hospital
Basel,1 Children's Hospital Triemli
Zürich2 and University Children's
Hospital Zürich,3 University
Children's Hospital Berne4 and Swiss
Serum and Vaccine Institute,6 Berne, and
Children's Hospital St. Gallen, St.
Gallen,5 Switzerland
Received 24 September 1999/Returned for modification 16 December
1999/Accepted 7 February 2000
The objective of this study was to compare the immunogenicity and
safety of a single-dose regimen and a two-dose regimen of a trivalent
virosome influenza vaccine (Inflexal Berna V) with those of a trivalent
subunit influenza vaccine (Influvac) in children and adolescents with
cystic fibrosis (CF). In an open, randomized, multicenter study with
parallel groups, 11 young children with CF (1 to 6 years old) and 53 older children and adolescents with CF (>6 years old) were randomly
assigned to one of the following immunization regimens: virosome
vaccine at 0.5 ml on study day 0 or 0.25 ml on days 0 and 28 or a
standard regimen of subunit vaccine, i.e., 0.5 ml on day 0 for older
children and 0.25 ml on days 0 and 28 for younger children. Safety
assessments, i.e., recording of systemic and local adverse events (AEs)
and vital signs, were made for a 5-day observation period after each
immunization. Hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titers were determined
at baseline and 4 weeks after the single-dose and the two-dose
immunizations, respectively. Immunogenicity was assessed according to
the criteria of the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal
Products (EMEA). Both vaccines induced comparable HI antibody titers.
Seroconversion (
0066-4804/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Comparison of Immunogenicity and Safety of a
Virosome Influenza Vaccine with Those of a Subunit Influenza
Vaccine in Pediatric Patients with Cystic Fibrosis
4-fold rise in HI antibody titers, reaching a titer
of
1:40) was achieved in 41 to 100% of the participants.
Seroprotection (HI titer,
1:40) and a >2.5-fold increase in
geometric mean titers were achieved in 100% of the participants. Thus,
all three EMEA requirements for influenza vaccine efficacy were met by
all treatment groups and for both vaccines. The virosome vaccine, when
administered as a single dose, seemed to induce superior immunogenicity
compared with the standard pediatric two-dose regimen. Totals of 42 and 57% of vaccinees receiving virosome and subunit vaccines,
respectively, reported at least one local AE (predominantly pain).
Totals of 84 and 71% of subjects receiving virosome and subunit
vaccines, respectively, complained in response to questions of at least one systemic AE (mainly cough, fatigue, coryza, or headache). The
majority of events were mild or moderate and lasted 1 or 2 days only.
No obvious relationship was found between AE reporting rate and vaccine
formulation, age group, or dose regimen. The relatively high AE
reporting rate seemed to be partly related to the symptomatology of the
underlying CF disease. In summary, the virosome and subunit vaccines
induced in both age groups and against all three influenza strains an
efficient immune response and were well tolerated by the children and
adolescents with CF.
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: University
Children's Hospital, P.O. Box, CH-4005 Basel, Switzerland. Phone: 41 61 685 62 56. Fax: 41 61 685 60 01. E-mail:
urs-b.schaad{at}unibas.ch.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. |
|---|---|
| J. Clin. Microbiol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |