AAC
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McGinnis, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Nunn, G. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McGinnis, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Nunn, G. B.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, May 2000, p. 1407-1408, Vol. 44, No. 5
0066-4804/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

In Vitro Comparison of Terbinafine and Itraconazole against Penicillium marneffei

Michael R. McGinnis,1,* Nicole G. Nordoff,1 Neil S. Ryder,2 and Gary B. Nunn3

Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas 77555-06091; Novartis Research Institute, A-1235 Vienna, Austria2; and PE Biosystems, Foster City, California 944043

Received 19 October 1999/Returned for modification 17 December 1999/Accepted 7 February 2000

We evaluated terbinafine and itraconazole against 30 isolates of Penicillium marneffei using a modification of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards broth macrodilution MIC testing protocol for yeasts. The minimal fungicidal concentration (MFC) was determined by plating 100 µl from each MIC drug dilution having no growth onto Sabouraud glucose agar incubated at 30°C. The MFC was the dilution at which growth was absent at 72 h of incubation. The MICs, in micrograms per milliliter, were as follows: terbinafine, 0.03 to 1.0 (geometric mean titer, 0.09); itraconazole, 0.03 to 0.5 (geometric mean titer, 0.04). The MFCs, in micrograms per milliliter, were as follows: terbinafine, 0.03 to 8 (geometric mean titer, 2.60); itraconazole, 0.03 to 8 (geometric mean titer, 2.45). Primary fungicidal activity (MFC within 2 dilutions of MIC) was observed with terbinafine in eight isolates and with itraconazole in four isolates. The data indicate that terbinafine is active against P. marneffei in vitro and may have a previously unrealized role in the management of infections caused by this fungus.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: 301 University Blvd., Galveston, TX 77555-0609. Phone: (409) 747-0604. Fax: (409) 747-0605. E-mail: michael.mcginnis{at}utmb.edu.


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, May 2000, p. 1407-1408, Vol. 44, No. 5
0066-4804/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.






Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
J. Clin. Microbiol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.