Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, June 2000, p. 1655-1659, Vol. 44, No. 6
Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department
of Medicine, Albany Medical College, Albany, New
York1; Department of Biomedical
Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles,
California2; Glaxo Wellcome, Inc.,
Greenford, United Kingdom3; and Glaxo
Wellcome, Inc., Research Triangle Park, North
Carolina4
Received 17 September 1999/Returned for modification 23 January
2000/Accepted 15 March 2000
The delineation of optimal regimens for combinations of agents is a
difficult problem, in part because, to address it, one needs to (i)
have effect relationships between the pathogen in question and the
drugs in the combination, (ii) have knowledge of how the drugs interact
(synergy, antagonism, and additivity), and (iii) address the issue of
true between-patient variability in pharmacokinetics for the drugs in
the population. We have developed an approach which employs a fully
parametric assessment of drug interaction using the equation of W. R. Greco, G. Bravo, and J. C. Parsons (Pharmacol. Rev.
47:331-385, 1995) to generate an estimate of effects for the two drugs
and have linked this approach to a population simulator, using Monte
Carlo methods, which produce concentration-time profiles for the drugs
in combination. This software automatically integrates the effect over
a steady-state dosing interval and produces an estimate of the mean
effect over a steady-state interval for each simulated subject. In this
way, doses and schedules can be easily evaluated. This software allows for a rational choice of dose and schedule for evaluation in clinical trials. We evaluated different schedules of administration for the
combination of the nucleoside analogue abacavir plus the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease inhibitor amprenavir. Amprenavir was simulated as either 800 mg every 8 h (q8h) or 1,200 mg q12h, each along with 300 mg q12h of abacavir. Both regimens produced excellent effects over the simulated population of 500 subjects, with
average percentages of maximal effect (as determined from the in vitro
assays) of 90.9% ± 11.4% and 80.9% ± 18.6%, respectively. This
difference is statistically significant (P
0066-4804/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Use of Drug Effect Interaction Modeling with Monte Carlo
Simulation To Examine the Impact of Dosing Interval on the Projected
Antiviral Activity of the Combination of Abacavir and
Amprenavir
0.001). In addition, 68.8 and 46.0% of the population
had an average percentage of maximal effect which was greater than or
equal to 90% for the two regimens. We can conclude that the
combination of abacavir plus amprenavir is a potent combination when it
is given on either schedule. However, the more fractionated schedule
for the protease inhibitor produced significantly better effects in
combination. Clinicians need to explicitly balance the improvement in
antiviral effect seen with the more fractionated regimen against the
loss of compliance attendant to the use of such a regimen. This
approach may be helpful in the preclinical evaluation of multidrug
anti-infective regimens.
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Division of
Clinical Pharmacology, Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY 12208. Phone: (518) 262-6330. Fax: (518)
262-6333. E-mail: GLDRUSANO{at}AOL.COM.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. |
|---|---|
| J. Clin. Microbiol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |