This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Akins, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Rybak, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Akins, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Rybak, M. J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, July 2000, p. 1925-1929, Vol. 44, No. 7
0066-4804/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

In Vitro Activities of Daptomycin, Arbekacin, Vancomycin, and Gentamicin Alone and/or in Combination against Glycopeptide Intermediate-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an Infection Model

Ronda L. Akins1,2 and Michael J. Rybak1,2,3,*

The Anti-Infective Research Laboratory, Department of Pharmacy Services, Detroit Receiving Hospital and University Health Center,1 and College of Pharmacy and Allied Health Professions2 and School of Medicine,3 Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48201

Received 20 December 1999/Returned for modification 15 February 2000/Accepted 26 April 2000

Daptomycin, a lipopeptide antibiotic, has broad activity against gram-positive organisms, similar to vancomycin; however, its mechanism of action differs, resulting in interference with cell membrane transport and a more rapid bactericidal activity. In light of increasing need for alternative treatments against intermediate-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, there is revitalized interest in this antibiotic. We, therefore, evaluated the activity of daptomycin alone or in combination in an in vitro infection model against two glycopeptide intermediate-resistant S. aureus (GISA) isolates. Newly designed regimens of daptomycin at 4 and 6 mg/kg of body weight every 24 h (q24h) were compared to the previous regimen of 3 mg/kg q12h. Daptomycin MICs and minimal bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) (MIC/MBC) for Mu-50, HIP5836 (992), and MRSA-67 were 0.5/1.0, 0.5/1.0, and 0.125/0.5 µg/ml, respectively. MICs and MBCs of arbekacin for the three strains were 2.0/8.0, 0.125/0.5, and 0.125/0.25 µg/ml, respectively. Vancomycin and gentamicin MICs and MBCs for the three strains were 8.0/8.0, 8.0/8.0, and 0.5/1.0 µg/ml and 128/128, 0.5/1.0, and 0.25/0.5 µg/ml, respectively. Our experience with daptomycin in an in vitro infection model has shown significant kill against the two GISA strains (Mu-50 and 992) (P < 0.03). We also noted that kill was related to a total dose effect for 992, in which simulated daptomycin in vivo dosages of 6 mg/kg q24h and 3 mg/kg q12h produced similar kill and 4 mg/kg q24h resulted in significant regrowth (P <=  0.05). Combination therapy with arbekacin resulted in synergistic activity against Mu-50. Daptomycin area under the concentration-time curve/MIC and Cmax/MIC ranges for GISA isolates were 80 to 116 and 6 to 12, respectively, and ranges for MRSA-67 were 320 to 461 and 24 to 48, respectively, and appeared to have an association with kill (i.e., decreased CFU/milliliter) at 24 and 48 h. Therefore, these experiments suggest that daptomycin alone or in combination could provide an alternative for the treatment of GISA.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: The Anti-Infective Research Laboratory, Department of Pharmacy Services (1B), Detroit Receiving Hospital and University Health Center, 4201 St. Antoine Blvd., Detroit, MI 48201. Phone: (313) 745-4554. Fax: (313) 993-2522. E-mail: mrybak{at}dmc.org.


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, July 2000, p. 1925-1929, Vol. 44, No. 7
0066-4804/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Steenbergen, J. N., Mohr, J. F., Thorne, G. M. (2009). Effects of daptomycin in combination with other antimicrobial agents: a review of in vitro and animal model studies. J Antimicrob Chemother 64: 1130-1138 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Mortin, L. I., Li, T., Van Praagh, A. D. G., Zhang, S., Zhang, X.-X., Alder, J. D. (2007). Rapid Bactericidal Activity of Daptomycin against Methicillin-Resistant and Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Peritonitis in Mice as Measured with Bioluminescent Bacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51: 1787-1794 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Firsov, A. A., Smirnova, M. V., Lubenko, I. Yu., Vostrov, S. N., Portnoy, Y. A., Zinner, S. H. (2006). Testing the mutant selection window hypothesis with Staphylococcus aureus exposed to daptomycin and vancomycin in an in vitro dynamic model. J Antimicrob Chemother 58: 1185-1192 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • DeRyke, C. A., Sutherland, C., Zhang, B., Nicolau, D. P., Kuti, J. L. (2006). Serum Bactericidal Activities of High-Dose Daptomycin with and without Coadministration of Gentamicin against Isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus species. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50: 3529-3534 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Cui, L., Tominaga, E., Neoh, H.-m., Hiramatsu, K. (2006). Correlation between Reduced Daptomycin Susceptibility and Vancomycin Resistance in Vancomycin-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50: 1079-1082 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Huang, V., Rybak, M. J. (2005). Pharmacodynamics of Cefepime Alone and in Combination with Various Antimicrobials against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an In Vitro Pharmacodynamic Infection Model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49: 302-308 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • LaPlante, K. L., Rybak, M. J. (2004). Impact of High-Inoculum Staphylococcus aureus on the Activities of Nafcillin, Vancomycin, Linezolid, and Daptomycin, Alone and in Combination with Gentamicin, in an In Vitro Pharmacodynamic Model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48: 4665-4672 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Cha, R., Rybak, M. J. (2004). Influence of protein binding under controlled conditions on the bactericidal activity of daptomycin in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model. J Antimicrob Chemother 54: 259-262 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Cha, R., Brown, W. J., Rybak, M. J. (2003). Bactericidal Activities of Daptomycin, Quinupristin-Dalfopristin, and Linezolid against Vancomycin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an In Vitro Pharmacodynamic Model with Simulated Endocardial Vegetations. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 3960-3963 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Allen, G. P., Kaatz, G. W., Rybak, M. J. (2003). Activities of Mutant Prevention Concentration-Targeted Moxifloxacin and Levofloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae in an In Vitro Pharmacodynamic Model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 2606-2614 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Cha, R., Grucz, R. G. Jr., Rybak, M. J. (2003). Daptomycin Dose-Effect Relationship against Resistant Gram-Positive Organisms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 1598-1603 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Sakoulas, G., Eliopoulos, G. M., Alder, J., Eliopoulos, C. T. (2003). Efficacy of Daptomycin in Experimental Endocarditis Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcusaureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 1714-1718 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Allen, G. P., Cha, R., Rybak, M. J. (2002). In Vitro Activities of Quinupristin-Dalfopristin and Cefepime, Alone and in Combination with Various Antimicrobials, against Multidrug-Resistant Staphylococci and Enterococci in an In Vitro Pharmacodynamic Model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46: 2606-2612 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ida, T., Okamoto, R., Nonoyama, M., Irinoda, K., Kurazono, M., Inoue, M. (2002). Antagonism between Aminoglycosides and {beta}-Lactams in a Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolate Involves Induction of an Aminoglycoside-Modifying Enzyme. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46: 1516-1521 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Turner, J., Howe, R. A., Wootton, M., Bowker, K. E., Holt, H. A., Salisbury, V., Bennett, P. M., Walsh, T. R., MacGowan, A. P. (2001). The activity of vancomycin against heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus explored using an in vitro pharmacokinetic model. J Antimicrob Chemother 48: 727-730 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Akins, R. L., Rybak, M. J. (2001). Bactericidal Activities of Two Daptomycin Regimens against Clinical Strains of Glycopeptide Intermediate-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium, and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates in an In Vitro Pharmacodynamic Model with Simulated Endocardial Vegetations. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45: 454-459 [Abstract] [Full Text]