Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, August 2000, p. 2149-2153, Vol. 44, No. 8
Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New
Jersey1; GFI Pharmaceutical Services,
Inc., Evansville, Indiana2;
University of Liverpool3 and
Royal Liverpool University Hospital
Trust,4 Liverpool, United Kingdom; and
Bristol-Myers Squibb, Waterloo, Belgium5
Received 20 April 2000/Accepted 10 May 2000
Two open-label studies assessed the pharmacokinetics of single
orally administered doses of 40 mg of stavudine in subjects with
renal impairment. In one study (study I), 15 subjects with selected
degrees of renal impairment, but not requiring hemodialysis, were stratified into three groups of five subjects each according to
creatinine clearance (CLCR) normalized by body surface area (ml/min/1.73 m2): mild (CLCR, 60 to 80),
moderate (30 to 50), and severe (
0066-4804/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Pharmacokinetics of Single-Dose Oral Stavudine in Subjects with
Renal Impairment and in Subjects Requiring Hemodialysis
20) renal impairment. Five healthy
subjects (CLCR
90) were also enrolled. The
stavudine area under the curve from 0 h to infinity (AUC0-
) increased nonlinearly with declining renal function: 1,864, 2,215, 3,609, and 5,928 ng · h/ml for
normal renal function and for mild, moderate, and severe renal
impairment, respectively (P = 0.0001 between renal
impairment groups). The following stavudine dosage
recommendations for renal impairment were proposed for subjects
weighing
60 kg: CLCR of >50 ml/min/1.73 m2, 40 mg every 12 h; CLCR of 21 to
50 ml/min/1.73 m2, 20 mg every 12 h; and
CLCR of 10 to 20 ml/min/1.73 m2, 20 mg every
24 h. For subjects weighing <60 kg, the proposed doses were 30, 15, and 15 mg, respectively, with the same dosing intervals specified
above. In a second study (study II), 12 subjects with end-stage
renal disease requiring hemodialysis three times a week were
enrolled in a randomized, open-label crossover study (dialysis 2 h
after dosing and lasting 4 h or dosing without dialysis). There
were no statistically significant differences for
AUC0-
, AUC2-6, time to maximum
concentration of drug in serum, half-life, or apparent oral
clearance when the two treatment dosage regimens were
compared. As a result of study II, the recommended dosing rate for
subjects requiring hemodialysis was the same as that proposed
for those with severe renal impairment not requiring hemodialysis; however, dosing was recommended to follow
hemodialysis and to occur at the same time each day.
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Clinical Pharmacology/Experimental Medicine, Bristol-Myers Squibb
Pharmaceutical Research Institute, P.O. Box 4000, Princeton, NJ 08543. Phone: (609) 252-5487. Fax: (609) 252-6816. E-mail:
dennis.grasela{at}bms.com.
This article has been cited by other articles:
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»