AAC
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baum, E. Z.
Right arrow Articles by Bush, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baum, E. Z.
Right arrow Articles by Bush, K.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, November 2001, p. 3182-3188, Vol. 45, No. 11
0066-4804/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.11.3182-3188.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Identification and Characterization of New Inhibitors of the Escherichia coli MurA Enzyme

Ellen Z. Baum,* Deborah A. Montenegro, Lisa Licata, Ignatius Turchi, Glenda C. Webb, Barbara D. Foleno, and Karen Bush

The R. W. Johnson Pharmaceutical Research Institute, Raritan, New Jersey 08869

Received 13 April 2001/Returned for modification 11 June 2001/Accepted 2 August 2001

The bacterial enzyme MurA catalyzes the transfer of enolpyruvate from phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) to uridine diphospho-N-acetylglucosamine (UNAG), which is the first committed step of bacterial cell wall biosynthesis. From high-throughput screening of a chemical library, three novel inhibitors of the Escherichia coli MurA enzyme were identified: the cyclic disulfide RWJ-3981, the purine analog RWJ-140998, and the pyrazolopyrimidine RWJ-110192. When MurA was preincubated with inhibitor, followed by addition of UNAG and PEP, the 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC50s) were 0.2 to 0.9 µM, compared to 8.8 µM for the known MurA inhibitor, fosfomycin. The three compounds exhibited MICs of 4 to 32 µg/ml against Staphylococcus aureus; however, the inhibition of DNA, RNA, and protein synthesis in addition to peptidoglycan synthesis by all three inhibitors indicated that antibacterial activity was not due specifically to MurA inhibition. The presence of UNAG during the MurA and inhibitor preincubation lowered the IC50 at least fivefold, suggesting that, like fosfomycin, the three compounds may interact with the enzyme in a specific fashion that is enhanced by UNAG. Ultrafiltration and mass spectrometry experiments suggested that the compounds were tightly, but not covalently, associated with MurA. Molecular modeling studies demonstrated that the compounds could fit into the site occupied by fosfomycin; exposure of MurA to each compound reduced the labeling of MurA by tritiated fosfomycin. Taken together, the evidence indicates that these inhibitors may bind noncovalently to the MurA enzyme, at or near the site where fosfomycin binds.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: The R.W. Johnson Pharmaceutical Research Institute, 1000 Route 202, Raritan, NJ 08869. Phone: (908) 704-4320. Fax: (908) 526-3047. E-mail: ebaum{at}prius.jnj.com.


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, November 2001, p. 3182-3188, Vol. 45, No. 11
0066-4804/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.11.3182-3188.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
J. Clin. Microbiol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.