Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, December 2001, p. 3524-3530, Vol. 45, No. 12
Department of Pharmacology, University of
Essen, Essen,1 Department of Urology,
Hospital St. Elisabeth, Straubing,2
IBMP-Institute for Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Research,
Nürnberg-Heroldsberg,3 and
SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals,
Munich,5 Germany, and
SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, Harlow, United
Kingdom4
Received 20 September 2000/Returned for modification 26 April
2001/Accepted 15 August 2001
In a randomized crossover study, 16 volunteers (8 men, 8 women)
received single oral doses of 320 mg of gemifloxacin and 400 mg of
ofloxacin on two separate occasions in the fasting state to assess the
urinary excretion and urinary bactericidal titers (UBTs) at intervals
for up to 144 h. Ofloxacin showed higher concentrations in urine
compared with those of gemifloxacin. The median (range) cumulative
excretion of gemifloxacin was 29.7% (8.4 to 48.7%) of the parent drug
administered, and median (range) cumulative excretion of ofloxacin was
84.3% (46.5 to 95.2%) of the parent drug administered. The UBTs,
i.e., the highest twofold dilutions (with antibiotic-free urine as the
diluent) of urine that were still bactericidal, were determined for a
reference strain and nine uropathogens for which the MICs of
gemifloxacin and ofloxacin were as follows:
Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, 0.016 and 0.06 µg/ml, respectively; Klebsiella pneumoniae, 0.03 and 0.06 µg/ml, respectively; Proteus mirabilis, 0.125 and
0.125 µg/ml, respectively; Escherichia coli, 0.06 and
0.5 µg/ml, respectively; Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 1 and
4 µg/ml, respectively; Staphylococcus aureus, 0.008 and 0.25 µg/ml, respectively; Enterococcus
faecalis, 0.06 and 2 µg/ml, respectively;
Staphylococcus aureus, 0.25 and 4 µg/ml, respectively; Enterococcus faecalis, 0.5 and 32 µg/ml, respectively;
and Staphylococcus aureus, 2 and 32 µg/ml,
respectively. Generally, the UBTs for gram-positive uropathogens
were higher for gemifloxacin than for ofloxacin and the UBTs for
gram-negative uropathogens were higher for ofloxacin than for
gemifloxacin. According to the UBTs, ofloxacin-resistant uropathogens
(MICs,
0066-4804/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.12.3524-3530.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Urinary Excretion and Bactericidal Activities of
Gemifloxacin and Ofloxacin after a Single Oral Dose in Healthy
Volunteers
4 mg/liter) should also be considered gemifloxacin resistant.
Although clinical trials have shown that gemifloxacin is effective for
the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections, whether an
oral dosage of 320 mg of gemifloxacin once daily is also adequate for
the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections has yet to be confirmed.
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Urology, Hospital St. Elisabeth, St.-Elisabeth-Str. 23, 94315 Straubing, Germany. Phone: 49-9421-710-1700. Fax:
49-9421-710-270. E-mail: NaberK{at}klinikum-straubing.de.
This article has been cited by other articles:
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»