This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Noreddin, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Zhanel, G. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Noreddin, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Zhanel, G. G.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, December 2002, p. 4029-4034, Vol. 46, No. 12
0066-4804/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.12.4029-4034.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Clarithromycin against Macrolide-Resistant [PCR-Positive mef(A) or erm(B)] Streptococcus pneumoniae Simulating Clinically Achievable Serum and Epithelial Lining Fluid Free-Drug Concentrations

Ayman M. Noreddin,1 Danielle Roberts,2 Kim Nichol,1,2 Aleksandra Wierzbowski,1 Daryl J. Hoban,1,2 and George G. Zhanel1,2,3*

Department of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Manitoba,2 Departments of Clinical Microbiology,3 Medicine, Health Sciences Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada1

Received 11 October 2001/ Returned for modification 22 April 2002/ Accepted 10 August 2002

The association between macrolide resistance mechanisms and clinical outcomes remains understudied. The present study, using an in vitro pharmacodynamic model, assessed clarithromycin (CLR) activity against mef(A)-positive and erm(B)-negative Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates by simulating free-drug concentrations in serum and both total (protein-bound and free) and free drug in epithelial lining fluid (ELF). Five mef(A)-positive and erm(B)-negative strains, one mef(A)-negative and erm(B)-positive strain, and a control [mef(A)-negative and erm(B)-negative] strain of S. pneumoniae were tested. CLR was modeled using a one-compartment model, simulating a dosage of 500 mg, per os, twice a day (in serum, free-drug Cp maximum of 2 µg/ml, t1/2 of 6 h; in ELF, CELF(total) maximum of 35µg/ml, t1/2 of 6 h; CELF(free) maximum of 14 µg/ml, t1/2 of 6 h). Starting inocula were 106 CFU/ml in Mueller-Hinton broth with 2% lysed horse blood. With sampling at 0, 4, 8, 12, 20, and 24 h, the extent of bacterial killing was assessed. Achieving CLR T/MIC values of >=90% (AUC0-24/MIC ratio, >=61) resulted in bacterial eradication, while T>MIC values of 40 to 56% (AUC0-24/MIC ratios of >=30.5 to 38) resulted in a 1.2 to 2.0 log10 CFU/ml decrease at 24 h compared to that for the initial inoculum. CLR T/MIC values of <=8% (AUC0-24/MIC ratio, <=17.3) resulted in a static effect or bacterial regrowth. The high drug concentrations in ELF that were obtained clinically with CLR may explain the lack of clinical failures with mef(A)-producing S. pneumoniae strains, with MICs up to 8 µg/ml. However, mef(A) isolates for which MICs are >=16 µg/ml along with erm(B) may result in bacteriological failures.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Clinical Microbiology, Health Sciences Centre, MS673-820, Sherbrook St., Winnipeg, Manitoba R3A 1R9, Canada. Phone: (204) 787-4902. Fax: (204) 787-4699. E-mail: ggzhanel{at}pcs.mb.ca.


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, December 2002, p. 4029-4034, Vol. 46, No. 12
0066-4804/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.12.4029-4034.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Abduljalil, K., Kinzig, M., Bulitta, J., Horkovics-Kovats, S., Sorgel, F., Rodamer, M., Fuhr, U. (2009). Modeling the Autoinhibition of Clarithromycin Metabolism during Repeated Oral Administration. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53: 2892-2901 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Farrell, D. J., File, T. M., Jenkins, S. G. (2007). Prevalence and Antibacterial Susceptibility of mef(A)-Positive Macrolide-Resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae over 4 Years (2000 to 2004) of the PROTEKT US Study. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45: 290-293 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Zhanel, G. G., Johanson, C., Laing, N., Hisanaga, T., Wierzbowski, A., Hoban, D. J. (2005). Pharmacodynamic Activity of Telithromycin at Simulated Clinically Achievable Free-Drug Concentrations in Serum and Epithelial Lining Fluid against Efflux (mefE)-Producing Macrolide- Resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae for Which Telithromycin MICs Vary. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49: 1943-1948 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Zhanel, G. G., Johanson, C., Hisanaga, T., Mendoza, C., Laing, N., Noreddin, A., Wierzbowski, A., Hoban, D. J. (2004). Pharmacodynamic activity of telithromycin against macrolide-susceptible and macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae simulating clinically achievable free serum and epithelial lining fluid concentrations. J Antimicrob Chemother 54: 1072-1077 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Zhanel, G. G., DeCorby, M., Noreddin, A., Mendoza, C., Cumming, A., Nichol, K., Wierzbowski, A., Hoban, D. J. (2003). Pharmacodynamic activity of azithromycin against macrolide-susceptible and -resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae simulating clinically achievable free serum, epithelial lining fluid and middle ear fluid concentrations. J Antimicrob Chemother 52: 83-88 [Abstract] [Full Text]