AAC
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hayton, K.
Right arrow Articles by Walliker, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hayton, K.
Right arrow Articles by Walliker, D.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, August 2002, p. 2482-2489, Vol. 46, No. 8
0066-4804/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.8.2482-2489.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Sulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine Resistance in the Rodent Malaria Parasite Plasmodium chabaudi

Karen Hayton,1,{dagger} Lisa C. Ranford-Cartwright,2 and David Walliker1*

Institute of Cell, Animal and Population Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JT,1 Division of Infection and Immunity, Institute of Biomedical and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, United Kingdom2

Received 1 April 2002/ Returned for modification 25 April 2002/ Accepted 9 May 2002

We have studied resistance to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (S/P) in the rodent malaria parasite Plasmodium chabaudi. A stable S/P-resistant mutant, AS(50S/P), was selected by drug treatment of a clone, AS(PYR), already resistant to pyrimethamine. The sequences of the P. chabaudi dhfr and dhps genes were obtained and found to be identical in AS(50S/P) and AS(PYR), showing that resistance to S/P in AS(50S/P) was not due to additional mutations in either gene. AS(50S/P) was crossed with a drug-sensitive clone, AJ, and 16 independent recombinant progeny were obtained. These clones were phenotyped for their susceptibility to S/P and to sulfadoxine and pyrimethamine separately. Pyrimethamine resistance was invariably associated with S/P resistance, but no correlation was found between resistance to S/P and resistance to sulfadoxine. Quantitative trait locus analysis of the progeny with 31 chromosome-specific markers showed that mutant P. chabaudi dhfr, or one or more genes closely linked to it, was a major determinant of S/P resistance. In addition, the inheritance of genes on chromosomes 5 and 13 from the sensitive parent appeared to contribute to the level of resistance observed. These results demonstrate that the S/P resistance of the AS(50S/P) mutant of P. chabaudi does not involve mutation in dhps and is not due simply to a combination of two genes determining resistance to pyrimethamine and sulfadoxine separately.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institute of Cell, Animal and Population Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, United Kingdom. Phone: (44) 131 650 5548. Fax: (44) 131 650 6564. E-mail: D.Walliker{at}ed.ac.uk.

{dagger} Present address: LMVR/NIAID, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, August 2002, p. 2482-2489, Vol. 46, No. 8
0066-4804/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.8.2482-2489.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
J. Clin. Microbiol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.