This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sweeney, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Zurenko, G. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sweeney, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Zurenko, G. E.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, June 2003, p. 1902-1906, Vol. 47, No. 6
0066-4804/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AAC.47.6.1902-1906.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

In Vitro Activities of Linezolid Combined with Other Antimicrobial Agents against Staphylococci, Enterococci, Pneumococci, and Selected Gram-Negative Organisms

Michael T. Sweeney* and Gary E. Zurenko

Infectious Diseases Biology, Pharmacia Corporation, Kalamazoo, Michigan 49007

Received 25 November 2002/ Returned for modification 27 January 2003/ Accepted 26 February 2003

The activities of linezolid, an oxazolidinone antibacterial agent active against gram-positive organisms, alone and in combination with 35 antimicrobial agents were tested in vitro against methicillin-sensitive (n = 1 to 2 strains) and methicillin-resistant (n = 8 to 10) Staphylococcus aureus strains; vancomycin-sensitive (n = 6) and vancomycin-resistant (n = 6 to 8) Enterococcus faecalis strains; vancomycin-sensitive (n = 5) and vancomycin-resistant (n = 6) Enterococcus faecium strains; penicillin-sensitive (n = 2 to 5), penicillin-intermediate (n = 5 to 6), and penicillin-resistant (n = 5 to 6) Streptococcus pneumoniae strains; Escherichia coli (n = 6); and Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 6). The fractional inhibitory concentration indices of linezolid in combination with other antimicrobial agents for the organisms tested were generated on checkerboard broth microdilution plates prepared by a semiautomated method. Of 1,380 organism-drug combinations, 1,369 (99.2%) combinations of linezolid with 28 antimicrobial drugs were indifferent, 9 combinations (0.65%) of linezolid with 6 drugs (amoxicillin, erythromycin, imipenem, sparfloxacin, teicoplanin, and tetracycline) were synergistic, and 2 combinations (0.15%) of linezolid with 2 drugs (ofloxacin and sparfloxacin) were antagonistic. Overall, the in vitro data demonstrated that linezolid combined with other antimicrobial agents primarily produces an indifferent response, with infrequent occurrences of synergism and antagonism.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Pharmacia Corporation, 301 Henrietta St., 7263-267-504, Kalamazoo, MI 49007. Phone: (269) 833-3413. Fax: (269) 833-0992. E-mail: michael.t.sweeney{at}pharmacia.com.


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, June 2003, p. 1902-1906, Vol. 47, No. 6
0066-4804/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AAC.47.6.1902-1906.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Singh, S. R., Bacon, A. E. III, Young, D. C., Couch, K. A. (2009). In Vitro 24-Hour Time-Kill Studies of Vancomycin and Linezolid in Combination versus Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53: 4495-4497 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Baldoni, D., Haschke, M., Rajacic, Z., Zimmerli, W., Trampuz, A. (2009). Linezolid Alone or Combined with Rifampin against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Experimental Foreign-Body Infection. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53: 1142-1148 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Sandoe, J. A. T., Wysome, J., West, A. P., Heritage, J., Wilcox, M. H. (2006). Measurement of ampicillin, vancomycin, linezolid and gentamicin activity against enterococcal biofilms. J Antimicrob Chemother 57: 767-770 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Jones, R. N., Ross, J. E., Fritsche, T. R., Sader, H. S. (2006). Oxazolidinone susceptibility patterns in 2004: report from the Zyvox(R) Annual Appraisal of Potency and Spectrum (ZAAPS) Program assessing isolates from 16 nations. J Antimicrob Chemother 57: 279-287 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Pettit, R. K., Weber, C. A., Kean, M. J., Hoffmann, H., Pettit, G. R., Tan, R., Franks, K. S., Horton, M. L. (2005). Microplate Alamar Blue Assay for Staphylococcus epidermidis Biofilm Susceptibility Testing. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49: 2612-2617 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Li, R. C., Tang, M. C. (2005). Post-antibiotic effect induced by an antibiotic combination: influence of altered susceptibility to individual components. J Antimicrob Chemother 55: 583-586 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Jacqueline, C., Navas, D., Batard, E., Miegeville, A.-F., Le Mabecque, V., Kergueris, M.-F., Bugnon, D., Potel, G., Caillon, J. (2005). In Vitro and In Vivo Synergistic Activities of Linezolid Combined with Subinhibitory Concentrations of Imipenem against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49: 45-51 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Li, R. C., Tang, M. C. (2004). Post-antibiotic effect induced by an antibiotic combination: influence of mode, sequence and interval of exposure. J Antimicrob Chemother 54: 904-908 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Krueger, W. A., Kottler, B., Will, B. E., Heininger, A., Guggenberger, H., Unertl, K. E. (2004). Treatment of Meningitis Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis with Linezolid. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 929-932 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Yong, D., Yum, J. H., Lee, K., Chong, Y., Choi, S. H., Rhee, J. K. (2004). In Vitro Activities of DA-7867, a Novel Oxazolidinone, against Recent Clinical Isolates of Aerobic and Anaerobic Bacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48: 352-357 [Abstract] [Full Text]