This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Henry, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Swanson, R. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Henry, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Swanson, R. N.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, September 2003, p. 2770-2774, Vol. 47, No. 9
0066-4804/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AAC.47.9.2770-2774.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Randomized Double-Blind Study Comparing 3- and 6-Day Regimens of Azithromycin with a 10-Day Amoxicillin-Clavulanate Regimen for Treatment of Acute Bacterial Sinusitis

Dan C. Henry,1 Ernie Riffer,2 William N. Sokol,3 Naumann I. Chaudry,4 and Robert N. Swanson4*

Foothill Family Clinic, Salt Lake City, Utah,1 Central Phoenix Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona,2 Health Research Institute, Newport Beach, California,3 Pfizer Inc, New York, New York4

Received 25 November 2002/ Returned for modification 14 February 2003/ Accepted 11 April 2003

A randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of adults with acute bacterial sinusitis (ABS) compared the efficacy and safety of two azithromycin (AZM) regimens, 500 mg/day once daily for 3 days (AZM-3) or 6 days (AZM-6) to the efficacy and safety of an amoxicillin-clavulanate (AMC) regimen of 500-125 mg three times daily for 10 days. A total of 936 subjects with clinically and radiologically documented ABS were treated (AZM-3, 312; AZM-6, 311; AMC, 313). Clinical success rates were equivalent among per-protocol subjects at the end of therapy (AZM-3, 88.8%; AZM-6, 89.3%; AMC, 84.9%) and at the end of the study (AZM-3, 71.7%; AZM-6, 73.4%; AMC, 71.3%). Subjects treated with AMC reported a higher incidence of treatment-related adverse events (AE) (51.1%) than AZM-3 (31.1%, P < 0.001) or AZM-6 (37.6%, P < 0.001). More AMC subjects discontinued the study (n = 28) than AZM-3 (n = 7) and AZM-6 (n = 11) subjects. Diarrhea was the most frequent treatment-related AE. AZM-3 and AZM-6 were each equivalent in efficacy and better tolerated than AMC for ABS.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Pfizer Inc, 235 East 42nd St., New York, NY 10017-5755. Phone: (212) 573-2975. Fax: (212) 808-6341. E-mail: Swansr1{at}pfizer.com.


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, September 2003, p. 2770-2774, Vol. 47, No. 9
0066-4804/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AAC.47.9.2770-2774.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Masood, A., Moumoulidis, I., Panesar, J. (2007). Acute rhinosinusitis in adults: an update on current management. Postgrad. Med. J. 83: 402-408 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • D'Ignazio, J., Camere, M. A., Lewis, D. E., Jorgensen, D., Breen, J. D. (2005). Novel, Single-Dose Microsphere Formulation of Azithromycin versus 7-Day Levofloxacin Therapy for Treatment of Mild to Moderate Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Adults. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49: 4035-4041 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Piccirillo, J. F. (2004). Acute Bacterial Sinusitis. NEJM 351: 902-910 [Full Text]