AAC
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barchiesi, F.
Right arrow Articles by Scalise, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barchiesi, F.
Right arrow Articles by Scalise, G.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, September 2004, p. 3312-3316, Vol. 48, No. 9
0066-4804/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AAC.48.9.3312-3316.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Posaconazole and Amphotericin B Combination Therapy against Cryptococcus neoformans Infection

Francesco Barchiesi,1* Elisabetta Spreghini,1 Anna M. Schimizzi,1 Monia Maracci,1 Daniele Giannini,2 Flavia Carle,3 and Giorgio Scalise1

Istituto di Malattie Infettive e Medicina Pubblica,1 Centro di Gestione Presidenza Medicina e Chirurgia,2 Centro Interdipartimentale di Epidemiologia, Biostatistica, e Informatica Medica, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy3

Received 30 March 2004/ Returned for modification 25 April 2004/ Accepted 26 April 2004

To investigate the effects of posaconazole (POS) and amphotericin B (AMB) combination therapy in cryptococcal infection, we established an experimental model of systemic cryptococcosis in CD1 mice by intravenous injection of three distinct clinical isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans. Therapy was started 24 h after the infection and continued for 10 consecutive days. POS was given at 3 and 10 mg/kg of body weight/day, while AMB was given at 0.3 mg/kg/day. Combination therapy consisted of POS given at a low (combo 3) or at a high (combo 10) dose plus AMB. Survival studies showed that combo 3 was significantly more effective than POS at 3 mg/kg for two isolates tested (P value, ≤0.001), while combo 10 was significantly more effective than POS at 10 mg/kg for all three isolates (P values ranging from <0.001 to 0.005). However, neither combination regimen was more effective than AMB alone. For two isolates, combination therapy was significantly more effective than each single drug at reducing the fungal burden in the brain (P values ranging from 0.001 to 0.015) but not in the lungs. This study demonstrates that the major impact of POS and AMB combination therapy is on brain fungal burden rather than on survival.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Università Politecnica delle Marche, Azienda Ospedaliera Umberto I, Via Conca, 60020 Torrette di Ancona, Ancona, Italy. Phone: 39.071.5963467. Fax: 39.0715963468. E-mail: l.infettive{at}ao-umbertoprimo.marche.it.


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, September 2004, p. 3312-3316, Vol. 48, No. 9
0066-4804/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AAC.48.9.3312-3316.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
J. Clin. Microbiol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2004 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.