AAC
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rantala, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rantala, M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, October 2005, p. 4180-4184, Vol. 49, No. 10
0066-4804/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.49.10.4180-4184.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Prevalence and Molecular Genetics of Macrolide Resistance among Streptococcus pneumoniae Isolates Collected in Finland in 2002

M. Rantala,1,2* S. Huikko,3 P. Huovinen,1 J. Jalava,1 the Finnish Study Group for Antimicrobial Resistance

Department of Bacteriology and Inflammation, National Public Health Institute, Turku,1 Department of Clinical Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Helsinki University, Helsinki,2 School of Public Health, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland3

Received 11 February 2005/ Returned for modification 8 April 2005/ Accepted 8 July 2005

The prevalence and mechanisms of macrolide resistance among 1,007 clinical pneumococcal isolates collected in Finland were investigated. Of these, 217 (21.5%) were resistant to erythromycin and 11% to clindamycin. Among the erythromycin-resistant isolates, mef(E) was present in 95 isolates (44%), mef(A) was present in 12 isolates (6%), and erm(B) was present in 90 isolates (41%). A double mechanism, mef(E) and erm(B), was detected in five isolates (2%). Ribosomal mutation was detected in 14 (6%) macrolide-resistant isolates in which no other determinant was found. Based on the telithromycin MICs, two groups of isolates were formed: 83.3% of the isolates belonged to a major group for which the telithromycin MIC range was ≤0.008 to 0.063 µg/ml, and 16.7% belonged to a minor group for which the telithromycin MIC range was 0.125 to 8 µg/ml. All except three isolates in the minor population carried a macrolide resistance gene.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Laboratory of Human Microbial Ecology, National Public Health Institute, Kiinamyllynkatu 13, Turku FIN-20520, Finland. Phone: 358-2-331 6629. Fax: 358-2-331 6699. E-mail: merja.rantala{at}ktl.fi.


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, October 2005, p. 4180-4184, Vol. 49, No. 10
0066-4804/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.49.10.4180-4184.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
J. Clin. Microbiol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2005 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.