AAC
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Raad, I. I.
Right arrow Articles by Murray, B. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Raad, I. I.
Right arrow Articles by Murray, B. E.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, December 2005, p. 5046-5050, Vol. 49, No. 12
0066-4804/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.49.12.5046-5050.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium: Catheter Colonization, esp Gene, and Decreased Susceptibility to Antibiotics in Biofilm

Issam I. Raad,1* Hend A. Hanna,1* Maha Boktour,1 Gassan Chaiban,1 Ray Y. Hachem,1 Tanya Dvorak,1 Russell Lewis,1 and Barbara E. Murray2

Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control, and Employee Health, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center,1 Division of Infectious Diseases, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston—Medical School, Houston, Texas2

Received 14 April 2005/ Returned for modification 18 July 2005/ Accepted 29 September 2005

To evaluate the molecular characteristics and antibiotic susceptibility in biofilm of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF) organisms that had caused catheter-related VREF bacteremia (VREF-CRB), we compared 22 isolates causing bacteremia obtained from patients with VREF-CRB with 30 isolates from control patients with gastrointestinal colonization by VREF. Using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, we identified 17 unique strains among the 22 VREF-CRB isolates and 23 strains among the gastrointestinal isolates. The esp gene was detected in 53% (9 of 17) of the VREF-CRB and 61% (14 of 23) of the control strains (P = 0.6). VREF-CRB produced heavier biofilm colonization of silicone disks than did control organisms (P < 0.001). Daptomycin, minocycline, and quinupristin-dalfopristin were each independently more active than linezolid in reducing biofilm colonization by VREF-CRB (P < 0.01), with daptomycin being the most active, followed by minocycline. In conclusion, the esp gene in VREF is not associated with heavy biofilm colonization or catheter-related bacteremia. In biofilm, daptomycin and minocycline were the most active antibiotics against VREF, and linezolid was the least active.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health (Unit 402), P.O. Box 301402, Houston, TX 77230-1402. Phone for Issam Raad: (713) 792-7943. Fax: (713) 792-8233. E-mail: iraad{at}mdanderson.org. Phone for Hend A. Hanna: (713) 745-1118. Fax: (713) 792-8233. E-mail: hhanna@mdanderson.org.


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, December 2005, p. 5046-5050, Vol. 49, No. 12
0066-4804/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.49.12.5046-5050.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
J. Clin. Microbiol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2005 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.