This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Andes, D.
Right arrow Articles by Conklin, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Andes, D.
Right arrow Articles by Conklin, R.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, February 2006, p. 674-684, Vol. 50, No. 2
0066-4804/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.50.2.674-684.2006
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Comparison of Amphotericin B (AMB) and Two Lipid-Associated AMB Preparations, Liposomal AMB and AMB Lipid Complex, in Murine Candidiasis Models

D. Andes,1,2* N. Safdar,1 K. Marchillo,1,2 and R. Conklin1

Departments of Medicine,1 Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin2

Received 8 August 2005/ Returned for modification 11 October 2005/ Accepted 6 November 2005

It is generally accepted that the lipid formulations of amphotericin B (AMB) are not as potent as conventional AMB on a milligram-per-kilogram basis. We used a neutropenic murine disseminated candidiasis model to compare the in vivo potencies of AMB, liposomal AMB (L-AMB), and AMB lipid complex (ABLC) pharmacodynamically. The pharmacokinetics of the antifungals were examined in serum and in three organs commonly seeded in disseminated candidiasis (kidneys, liver, and lung). Both single-dose time-kill studies and multiple-dosing-regimen studies were used with each of the compounds. Determinations of the numbers of CFU in the kidneys were performed following the administration of three escalating single doses of the polyenes at various times over 48 h. The areas under the time-kill curves (AUTKs) for each dose level of the drugs were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA). In the multiple-dosing-regimen studies with five Candida isolates, AMB, L-AMB, and ABLC were administered daily for 72 h. The organism burdens in the mouse kidneys were similarly used as the treatment end point. Additional multiple regimen-dosing-studies were performed with a single Candida albicans isolate, and the microbiologic outcomes in four internal organs (kidneys, liver, spleen, and lung) were examined at the end of therapy (48 h). The relationship between the dose and the drug exposure expressed by the pharmacokinetics of the dosing regimens in serum and organ tissue were analyzed by using a maximum-effect model. ANOVA was used to compare the drug exposures necessary to achieve the 25% effective dose (ED25), ED50, ED75, and 1 log10 killing. Comparison of AUTKs suggested that AMB was 4.3- to 5.9-fold more potent than either ABLC or L-AMB. The time-kill curves for both lipid formulations were very similar. In the multiple-dosing-regimen studies, AMB was 5.0- to 8.0-fold more potent than each of the lipid formulations against five Candida isolates in the kidneys. Similar differences in potency (5.1- to 7.2-fold) were observed in the other end organs. The difference in pharmacokinetics in serum accounted for much of the difference in potency between AMB and ABLC (ratio of serum ABLC area under the curve of effective doses to serum AMB area under the curve of effective doses, 1.2). The differences in the kinetics in the various end organs between AMB and L-AMB were better at explaining the disparate potencies at these infection sites (ratio of organ L-AMB area under the curve of effective doses to organ AMB area under the curve of effective doses, 1.1).

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, 600 Highland Ave., Room H4/572, Madison, WI 53792. Phone: (608) 263-1545. Fax: (608) 263-4464. E-mail: dra{at}medicine.wisc.edu.

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, February 2006, p. 674-684, Vol. 50, No. 2
0066-4804/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.50.2.674-684.2006
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Gubbins, P. O., Amsden, J. R., McConnell, S. A., Anaissie, E. J. (2009). Pharmacokinetics and Buccal Mucosal Concentrations of a 15 Milligram per Kilogram of Body Weight Total Dose of Liposomal Amphotericin B Administered as a Single Dose (15 mg/kg), Weekly Dose (7.5 mg/kg), or Daily Dose (1 mg/kg) in Peripheral Stem Cell Transplant Patients. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53: 3664-3674 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lewis, R. E., Albert, N. D., Kontoyiannis, D. P. (2008). Efficacy of Single-Dose Liposomal Amphotericin B or Micafungin Prophylaxis in a Neutropenic Murine Model of Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52: 4178-4180 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Espada, R., Valdespina, S., Dea, M. A., Molero, G., Ballesteros, M. P., Bolas, F., Torrado, J. J. (2008). In vivo distribution and therapeutic efficacy of a novel amphotericin B poly-aggregated formulation. J Antimicrob Chemother 61: 1125-1131 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Goodwin, M. L., Drew, R. H. (2008). Antifungal serum concentration monitoring: an update. J Antimicrob Chemother 61: 17-25 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Smith, P. J., Olson, J. A., Constable, D., Schwartz, J., Proffitt, R. T., Adler-Moore, J. P. (2007). Effects of dosing regimen on accumulation, retention and prophylactic efficacy of liposomal amphotericin B. J Antimicrob Chemother 59: 941-951 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lewis, R. E., Liao, G., Hou, J., Chamilos, G., Prince, R. A., Kontoyiannis, D. P. (2007). Comparative Analysis of Amphotericin B Lipid Complex and Liposomal Amphotericin B Kinetics of Lung Accumulation and Fungal Clearance in a Murine Model of Acute Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51: 1253-1258 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Groll, A. H., Lyman, C. A., Petraitis, V., Petraitiene, R., Armstrong, D., Mickiene, D., Alfaro, R. M., Schaufele, R. L., Sein, T., Bacher, J., Walsh, T. J. (2006). Compartmentalized intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics of amphotericin B and its lipid formulations.. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50: 3418-3423 [Abstract] [Full Text]  


Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»