AAC
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chittick, G. E.
Right arrow Articles by Kearney, B. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chittick, G. E.
Right arrow Articles by Kearney, B. P.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, April 2006, p. 1304-1310, Vol. 50, No. 4
0066-4804/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.50.4.1304-1310.2006
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Pharmacokinetics of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate and Ritonavir-Boosted Saquinavir Mesylate Administered Alone or in Combination at Steady State

Gregory E. Chittick, Jian Zong,* M. Robert Blum, Jeffrey J. Sorbel, John A. Begley, Nathalie Adda, and Brian P. Kearney

Gilead Sciences, Inc., Durham, North Carolina

Received 19 September 2005/ Returned for modification 29 November 2005/ Accepted 10 January 2006

A phase I study was conducted to formally evaluate the steady-state pharmacokinetics (PK) of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and ritonavir (RTV)-boosted saquinavir mesylate (SQV) when coadministered in healthy volunteers. Forty subjects received multiple doses of TDF (300 mg, once daily) and SQV/RTV (1,000 mg/100 mg, twice daily) alone and together under steady-state conditions in an open-label, fixed sequence design. Blood samples for tenofovir (TFV) and SQV/RTV PK were drawn over respective 24- and 12-h dosing intervals, and drug concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Safety was assessed periodically by clinical and laboratory monitoring. Thirty-two subjects completed the study and were fully evaluable; three subjects discontinued participation in the study due to adverse events, three subjects withdrew for personal reasons, and two subjects withdrew because of inadequate venous access for blood sampling. Steady-state TFV PK were not significantly altered upon coadministration with SQV/RTV. Steady-state SQV (administered as SQV/RTV) AUCtau, Cmax, and Ctau increased 29, 22, and 47%, respectively, upon coadministration with TDF, and all subjects achieved a Ctau of >100 ng/ml. These modestly increased SQV exposures are not clinically meaningful given its clinical use with RTV already results in >10-fold-higher SQV levels. Steady-state RTV AUCtau and Cmax levels were not significantly altered, whereas Ctau was 23% higher upon coadministration of SQV/RTV and TDF. Thus, no clinically relevant interactions between TDF and RTV-boosted SQV were observed under conditions simulating clinical practice.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacokinetics, 4 University Place, 4611 University Dr., Durham, NC 27707. Phone: (919) 493-5980. Fax: (919) 493-5790. E-mail: jian.zong{at}gilead.com.


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, April 2006, p. 1304-1310, Vol. 50, No. 4
0066-4804/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.50.4.1304-1310.2006
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
J. Clin. Microbiol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.