This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kaye, K. S. Articles by Carmeli, Y. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kaye, K. S. Articles by Carmeli, Y.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, June 2006, p. 2192-2196, Vol. 50, No. 6
0066-4804/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.00060-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Differential Effects of Levofloxacin and Ciprofloxacin on the Risk for Isolation of Quinolone-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina,¹ University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois,² Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts³

Received 16 January 2006/ Returned for modification 20 February 2006/ Accepted 6 April 2006

Due to the greater in vitro activity of ciprofloxacin than that of levofloxacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the likelihood of isolating a clinical strain of quinolone-resistant (QR) P. aeruginosa might be greater after exposure to levofloxacin than ciprofloxacin. We examined the risk of isolating QR P. aeruginosa in association with prior levofloxacin or ciprofloxacin exposure. A case-case-control study was conducted. Two groups of cases, one with nosocomial QR P. aeruginosa infections and one with nosocomial quinolone-susceptible (QS) P. aeruginosa infections, were compared to a control group of hospitalized patients without P. aeruginosa infections. Bivariable and multivariable analyses were used to determine risk factors for isolation of QR P. aeruginosa and QS P. aeruginosa. One hundred seventeen QR P. aeruginosa and 255 QS P. aeruginosa cases were identified, and 739 controls were selected. Exposures to ciprofloxacin were similar among all three groups (8% for controls, 9.4% for QR P. aeruginosa cases, and 7.5% for QS P. aeruginosa cases; P 0.6). Levofloxacin use was more frequent in the QR P. aeruginosa cases than in the controls (35.9% and 22.1%, respectively; odds ratio [OR] = 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.3 to 3.0) and less frequent in QS P. aeruginosa cases (14.1% of QS P. aeruginosa cases; OR = 0.6; 95% CI = 0.4 to 0.9). In multivariable analysis, levofloxacin, but not ciprofloxacin, was a significant risk factor for isolation of QR P. aeruginosa (OR for levofloxacin = 1.7 [95% CI = 1.0 to 2.9]; OR for ciprofloxacin = 1.2 [95% CI = 0.6 to 2.5]). Levofloxacin was associated with a reduced risk of isolation of QS P. aeruginosa (OR = 0.6; 95% CI = 0.4 to 0.9), whereas ciprofloxacin had no significant effect (OR = 1.0; 95% CI = 0.6 to 1.8). In conclusion, the use of levofloxacin, but not ciprofloxacin, was associated with isolation of QR P. aeruginosa.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Patel, N., McNutt, L.-A., Lodise, T. P. (2008). Relationship between Various Definitions of Prior Antibiotic Exposure and Piperacillin-Tazobactam Resistance among Patients with Respiratory Tract Infections Caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52: 2933-2936 [Abstract] [Full Text]