AAC
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
AAC.01263-06v1
51/3/877    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dodds Ashley, E. S.
Right arrow Articles by Perfect, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dodds Ashley, E. S.
Right arrow Articles by Perfect, J. R.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, March 2007, p. 877-880, Vol. 51, No. 3
0066-4804/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.01263-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Comparative Pharmacokinetics of Voriconazole Administered Orally as either Crushed or Whole Tablets{triangledown}

E. S. Dodds Ashley,1* A. K. Zaas,1 A. F. Fang,2 B. Damle,2 and J. R. Perfect1

Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina,1 Pfizer Inc., New York, New York2

Received 9 October 2006/ Accepted 27 November 2006

Voriconazole is a triazole antifungal agent used to treat serious, invasive fungal infections including aspergillosis and candidemia. Limitations with existing formulations of voriconazole including restricted utility in patients with renal dysfunction (intravenous preparation) and the unavailability of an oral suspension in some countries make the administration of crushed tablets desirable in many clinical scenarios. However, concerns that this approach may alter the systemic absorption of voriconazole exist. Therefore, an open-label, randomized, two-way crossover comparative pharmacokinetic (PK) study using healthy volunteers was performed to compare these methods of tablet administration. In a random sequence, subjects received voriconazole tablets either crushed or whole. The voriconazole dose was 400 mg every 12 h for 1 day orally followed by 200 mg every 12 h orally for 5.5 days. Study periods were separated by 7 days. PK parameters were determined by the noncompartmental method. An equivalence approach with no-effect boundaries of 80 to 125% was used to assess bioequivalence. Twenty healthy subjects (10 males; aged 20 to 43 years) were enrolled in and completed the study. The adjusted mean areas under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to {tau}, where {tau} equals 12 h, for the crushed and whole tablet groups were 9,793 and 11,164 ng · h/ml, respectively (ratio, 87.72; 90% confidence interval [CI], 80.97, 95.04). The ratio of the maximum concentration of drug in serum for the crushed tablet versus whole tablet arms was 94.94 (90% CI, 86.51, 104.22). The only difference noted between groups was a slightly faster time to maximum concentration of drug in serum when subjects received crushed tablets, 0.5 h versus 1.5 h (90% CI, –0.75, –0.25). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 12 subjects receiving whole tablets and 9 subjects receiving crushed tablets; all were mild. The administration of crushed voriconazole tablets is bioequivalent to whole-tablet administration.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: DUMC-3281, Room 0201B, Duke South Hospital, Trent Drive, Durham, NC 27710. Phone: (919) 684-2584. Fax: (919) 681-7338. E-mail: libby.dodds{at}duke.edu.

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 4 December 2006.


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, March 2007, p. 877-880, Vol. 51, No. 3
0066-4804/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.01263-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
J. Clin. Microbiol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.