AAC
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
AAC.01623-06v1
51/8/2716    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hecht, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Gerding, D. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hecht, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Gerding, D. N.
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, August 2007, p. 2716-2719, Vol. 51, No. 8
0066-4804/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.01623-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

In Vitro Activities of 15 Antimicrobial Agents against 110 Toxigenic Clostridium difficile Clinical Isolates Collected from 1983 to 2004{triangledown}

David W. Hecht,1,2* Minerva A. Galang,1 Susan P. Sambol,2 James R. Osmolski,1 Stuart Johnson,1,2 and Dale N. Gerding1,2

Loyola University Medical Center and Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois,1 Edward Hines Jr. Veterans Affairs Hospital, Hines, Illinois2

Received 28 December 2006/ Returned for modification 1 March 2007/ Accepted 14 May 2007

The incidence and severity of Clostridium difficile-associated disease (CDAD) is increasing, and standard treatment is not always effective. Therefore, more-effective antimicrobial agents and treatment strategies are needed. We used the agar dilution method to determine the in vitro susceptibility of the following antimicrobials against 110 toxigenic clinical isolates of C. difficile from 1983 to 2004, primarily from the United States: doripenem, meropenem, gatifloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, OPT-80, ramoplanin, rifalazil, rifaximin, nitazoxanide, tizoxanide, tigecycline, vancomycin, tinidazole, and metronidazole. Included among the isolates tested were six strains of the toxinotype III, NAP1/BI/027 group implicated in recent U.S., Canadian, and European outbreaks. The most active agents in vitro were rifaximin, rifalazil, tizoxanide, nitazoxanide, and OPT-80 with MICs at which 50% of the isolates are inhibited (MIC50) and MIC90 values of 0.0075 and 0.015 µg/ml, 0.0075 and 0.03 µg/ml, 0.06 and 0.125 µg/ml, 0.06 and 0.125 µg/ml, 0.125 and 0.125 µg/ml, respectively. However, for three isolates the rifalazil and rifaximin MICs were very high (MIC of >256 µg/ml). Ramoplanin, vancomycin, doripenem, and meropenem were also very active in vitro with narrow MIC50 and MIC90 ranges. None of the isolates were resistant to metronidazole, the only agent for which there are breakpoints, with tinidazole showing nearly identical results. These in vitro susceptibility results are encouraging and support continued evaluation of selected antimicrobials in clinical trials of treatment for CDAD.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Microbiology and Immunology, Loyola University Medical Center, 2160 S. First Avenue, Maywood, IL 60153. Phone: (708) 216-3232. Fax: (708) 216-8198. E-mail: dhecht{at}lumc.edu

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 21 May 2007.


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, August 2007, p. 2716-2719, Vol. 51, No. 8
0066-4804/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.01623-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
J. Clin. Microbiol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.