AAC
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
AAC.00218-07v1
51/9/3089    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Queenan, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bush, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Queenan, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bush, K.
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, September 2007, p. 3089-3095, Vol. 51, No. 9
0066-4804/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.00218-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Interactions of Ceftobiprole with ß-Lactamases from Molecular Classes A to D{triangledown}

Anne Marie Queenan,1* Wenchi Shang,1 Malgosia Kania,2 Malcolm G. P. Page,2 and Karen Bush1

Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development, L.L.C., 1000 Route 202 South, Raritan, New Jersey 08869,1 Basilea Pharmaceutica Ltd., Grenzacherstrasse 487, P.O. Box, CH-4005 Basel, Switzerland2

Received 13 February 2007/ Returned for modification 5 April 2007/ Accepted 14 June 2007

The interactions of ceftobiprole with purified ß-lactamases from molecular classes A, B, C, and D were determined and compared with those of benzylpenicillin, cephaloridine, cefepime, and ceftazidime. Enzymes were selected from functional groups 1, 2a, 2b, 2be, 2d, 2e, and 3 to represent ß-lactamases from organisms within the antibacterial spectrum of ceftobiprole. Ceftobiprole was refractory to hydrolysis by the common staphylococcal PC1 ß-lactamase, the class A TEM-1 ß-lactamase, and the class C AmpC ß-lactamase but was labile to hydrolysis by class B, class D, and class A extended-spectrum ß-lactamases. Cefepime and ceftazidime followed similar patterns. In most cases, the hydrolytic stability of a substrate correlated with the MIC for the producing organism. Ceftobiprole and cefepime generally had lower MICs than ceftazidime for AmpC-producing organisms, particularly AmpC-overexpressing Enterobacter cloacae organisms. However, all three cephalosporins were hydrolyzed very slowly by AmpC cephalosporinases, suggesting that factors other than ß-lactamase stability contribute to lower ceftobiprole and cefepime MICs against many members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development, L.L.C., 1000 Route 202 South, Raritan, NJ 08869. Phone: (908) 704-5515. Fax: (908) 707-3501. E-mail: aqueenan{at}prdus.jnj.com

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 25 June 2007.


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, September 2007, p. 3089-3095, Vol. 51, No. 9
0066-4804/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.00218-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
J. Clin. Microbiol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.