| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development, L.L.C., 1000 Route 202 South, Raritan, New Jersey 08869,1 Basilea Pharmaceutica Ltd., Grenzacherstrasse 487, P.O. Box, CH-4005 Basel, Switzerland2
Received 13 February 2007/ Returned for modification 5 April 2007/ Accepted 14 June 2007
The interactions of ceftobiprole with purified ß-lactamases from molecular classes A, B, C, and D were determined and compared with those of benzylpenicillin, cephaloridine, cefepime, and ceftazidime. Enzymes were selected from functional groups 1, 2a, 2b, 2be, 2d, 2e, and 3 to represent ß-lactamases from organisms within the antibacterial spectrum of ceftobiprole. Ceftobiprole was refractory to hydrolysis by the common staphylococcal PC1 ß-lactamase, the class A TEM-1 ß-lactamase, and the class C AmpC ß-lactamase but was labile to hydrolysis by class B, class D, and class A extended-spectrum ß-lactamases. Cefepime and ceftazidime followed similar patterns. In most cases, the hydrolytic stability of a substrate correlated with the MIC for the producing organism. Ceftobiprole and cefepime generally had lower MICs than ceftazidime for AmpC-producing organisms, particularly AmpC-overexpressing Enterobacter cloacae organisms. However, all three cephalosporins were hydrolyzed very slowly by AmpC cephalosporinases, suggesting that factors other than ß-lactamase stability contribute to lower ceftobiprole and cefepime MICs against many members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.
Published ahead of print on 25 June 2007.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. |
|---|---|
| J. Clin. Microbiol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |