This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Passarell, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ambrose, P. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Passarell, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ambrose, P. G.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, January 2008, p. 204-210, Vol. 52, No. 1
0066-4804/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.00813-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Exposure-Response Analyses of Tigecycline Efficacy in Patients with Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections{triangledown}

J. A. Passarell,1* A. K. Meagher,1 K. Liolios,1 B. B. Cirincione,1 S. A. Van Wart,1 T. Babinchak,2 E. J. Ellis-Grosse,2 and P. G. Ambrose3,4

Cognigen Corporation, Buffalo, New York,1 Wyeth Research, Collegeville, Pennsylvania,2 ICPD/Ordway Institute, Albany, New York,3 School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York4

Received 22 June 2007/ Returned for modification 13 August 2007/ Accepted 17 October 2007

Exposure-response analyses were performed to test the microbiological and clinical efficacies of tigecycline in complicated intra-abdominal infections where Escherichia coli and Bacteroides fragilis are the predominant pathogens. Data from evaluable patients enrolled in three clinical trials were pooled. Patients received intravenous tigecycline (100-mg loading dose followed by 50 mg every 12 h or 50-mg loading dose followed by 25 mg every 12 h). At the test-of-cure visit, microbiological and clinical responses were evaluated. Patients were prospectively classified into cohorts based on infection with a baseline pathogen(s): E. coli only (cohort 1), other mono- or polymicrobial Enterobacteriaceae (cohort 2), at least one Enterobacteriaceae pathogen plus an anaerobe(s) (cohort 3), at least one Enterobacteriaceae pathogen plus a gram-positive pathogen(s) (cohort 4), and all other pathogens (cohort 5). The cohorts were prospectively combined to increase sample size. Logistic regression was used to evaluate ratio of steady-state 24-hour area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) to MIC as a response predictor, and classification-and-regression-tree (CART) analyses were utilized to determine AUC/MIC breakpoints. Analysis began with cohorts 1, 2, and 3 pooled, which included 71 patients, with 106 pathogens. The small sample size precluded evaluation of cohorts 1 (34 patients, 35 E. coli pathogens) and 2 (16 patients, 24 Enterobacteriaceae). CART analyses identified a significant AUC/MIC breakpoint of 6.96 for microbiological and clinical responses (P values of 0.0004 and 0.399, respectively). The continuous AUC/MIC ratio was also borderline predictive of microbiological response (P = 0.0568). Cohort 4 (21 patients, 50 pathogens) was evaluated separately; however, an exposure-response relationship was not detected; cohort 5 (31 patients, 60 pathogens) was not evaluated. The prospective approach of creating homogenous populations of pathogens was critical for identifying exposure-response relationships in complicated intra-abdominal infections.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Cognigen Corporation, 395 Youngs Road, Buffalo, NY 14221. Phone: (716) 633-3463, ext. 266. Fax: (716) 633-7404. E-mail: Julie.Passarell{at}cognigencorp.com

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 22 October 2007.


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, January 2008, p. 204-210, Vol. 52, No. 1
0066-4804/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.00813-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Zhanel, G. G., Baudry, P. J., Tailor, F., Cox, L., Hoban, D. J., Karlowsky, J. A. (2009). Determination of the pharmacodynamic activity of clinically achievable tigecycline serum concentrations against clinical isolates of Escherichia coli with extended-spectrum {beta}-lactamases, AmpC {beta}-lactamases and reduced susceptibility to carbapenems using an in vitro model. J Antimicrob Chemother 64: 824-828 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Nicasio, A. M., Crandon, J. L., Nicolau, D. P. (2009). In Vivo Pharmacodynamic Profile of Tigecycline against Phenotypically Diverse Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53: 2756-2761 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Koomanachai, P., Kim, A., Nicolau, D. P. (2009). Pharmacodynamic evaluation of tigecycline against Acinetobacter baumannii in a murine pneumonia model. J Antimicrob Chemother 63: 982-987 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Crandon, J. L., Banevicius, M. A., Nicolau, D. P. (2009). Pharmacodynamics of Tigecycline against Phenotypically Diverse Staphylococcus aureus Isolates in a Murine Thigh Model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53: 1165-1169 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Crandon, J. L, Kuti, J. L, Jones, R. N, Nicolau, D. P (2009). Comparison of 2002-2006 OPTAMA Programs for US Hospitals: Focus on Gram-Negative Resistance. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 43: 220-227 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kelesidis, T., Karageorgopoulos, D. E., Kelesidis, I., Falagas, M. E. (2008). Tigecycline for the treatment of multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: a systematic review of the evidence from microbiological and clinical studies. J Antimicrob Chemother 62: 895-904 [Abstract] [Full Text]