Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, February 2008, p. 513-517, Vol. 52, No. 2
0066-4804/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AAC.01447-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Istituto di Malattie Infettive e Medicina Pubblica, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona,1 Dipartimento di Igiene e Microbiologia "D'Alessandro," Università degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo, Italy2
Received 7 November 2007/ Accepted 27 November 2007
We evaluated the effects of sequential therapy with caspofungin (CAS) or amphotericin B (AMB) followed by posaconazole (POS) against Candida glabrata. The susceptibilities to POS of yeast cells pre-exposed to CAS or AMB were identical to those of untreated cells as shown by standard Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth dilution, cell viability, and disk diffusion methods. We then investigated the activity of sequential regimens in an experimental model of disseminated candidiasis. CAS given at 1 mg/kg/day for 2 days followed by POS at either 15 or 30 mg/kg/day significantly reduced the counts compared to the controls, but this treatment was not superior to the use of CAS alone. Also, sequential regimens with AMB given at 1 mg/kg/day for 2 days followed by POS (AMB/POS) were effective at reducing the fungal burden against the controls. In addition, AMB/POS with both doses of the triazole were significantly more effective than AMB alone. Overall, our data showed that there is no therapeutic advantage in using CAS followed by POS, whereas an induction therapy with AMB followed by a maintenance regimen with POS might be a suitable strategy in managing C. glabrata infections.
Published ahead of print on 3 December 2007.
This article has been cited by other articles:
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»